activity
20182026
most citedQCD or What?

163 citations · 663 across the 18 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

20 papers

hep-ph2026

MadNIS, Ready for Production at LO

Theo Heimel, Olivier Mattelaer, Daniele Massaro +1

We extend neural multi-channel importance sampling in MadNIS to full proton-proton processes in a production-ready event-generation setup. We benchmark a wide range of LHC processe…

cs.LG2026

An Introduction to Bayesian and Frequentist Simulation-Based Inference with Machine Learning

Maximilian Dax, Theo Heimel, Gilles Louppe

Simulation-based inference (SBI) with machine learning is an increasingly important tool for solving inverse problems in science and engineering, including parameter inference and…

hep-ph2026

Neural Control Variates at LO and NLO

Theo Heimel, Tilman Plehn, Rebecca Revelli +2

We employ neural control variates to minimize the range of event weights and avoid negative weights for phase-space integration and event generation. A signed control variate, buil…

hep-ph2026

MadNIS at NLO

Giovanni De Crescenzo, Javier Mariño Villadamigo, Nina Elmer +4

We combine fast amplitude surrogates with neural importance sampling to accelerate NLO calculations. For virtual corrections, a learned ratio to the Born matrix element with calibr…

hep-ph2026

MadSpace -- Event Generation for the Era of GPUs and ML

Theo Heimel, Olivier Mattelaer, Ramon Winterhalder

MadSpace is a new modular phase-space and event-generation library written in C++ with native GPU support via CUDA and HIP. It provides a unified compute-graph-based framework for…

hep-ph2025

Simulation-Prior Independent Neural Unfolding Procedure

Anja Butter, Theo Heimel, Nathan Huetsch +2

Machine learning allows unfolding high-dimensional spaces without binning at the LHC. The new SPINUP method extracts the unfolded distribution based on a neural network encoding th…

hep-ph2024★ 1 cited

Profile Likelihoods on ML-Steroids

Theo Heimel, Tilman Plehn, Nikita Schmal

Profile likelihoods, for instance, describing global SMEFT analyses at the LHC are numerically expensive to construct and evaluate. Especially profiled likelihoods are notoriously…

hep-ph2024★ 14 cited

Differentiable MadNIS-Lite

Theo Heimel, Olivier Mattelaer, Tilman Plehn +1

Differentiable programming opens exciting new avenues in particle physics, also affecting future event generators. These new techniques boost the performance of current and planned…

hep-ph2024★ 22 cited

The Landscape of Unfolding with Machine Learning

Nathan Huetsch, Javier Mariño Villadamigo, Alexander Shmakov +9

Recent innovations from machine learning allow for data unfolding, without binning and including correlations across many dimensions. We describe a set of known, upgraded, and new…

hep-ph2023★ 30 cited

The MadNIS Reloaded

Theo Heimel, Nathan Huetsch, Fabio Maltoni +3

In pursuit of precise and fast theory predictions for the LHC, we present an implementation of the MadNIS method in the MadGraph event generator. A series of improvements in MadNIS…

hep-ph2023★ 20 cited

Precision-Machine Learning for the Matrix Element Method

Theo Heimel, Nathan Huetsch, Ramon Winterhalder +2

The matrix element method is the LHC inference method of choice for limited statistics. We present a dedicated machine learning framework, based on efficient phase-space integratio…

hep-ph2023★ 26 cited

Returning CP-Observables to The Frames They Belong

Jona Ackerschott, Rahool Kumar Barman, Dorival Gonçalves +2

Optimal kinematic observables are often defined in specific frames and then approximated at the reconstruction level. We show how multi-dimensional unfolding methods allow us to re…

hep-ph2023★ 42 cited

How to Understand Limitations of Generative Networks

Ranit Das, Luigi Favaro, Theo Heimel +3

Well-trained classifiers and their complete weight distributions provide us with a well-motivated and practicable method to test generative networks in particle physics. We illustr…

hep-ph2022★ 48 cited

MadNIS -- Neural Multi-Channel Importance Sampling

Theo Heimel, Ramon Winterhalder, Anja Butter +5

Theory predictions for the LHC require precise numerical phase-space integration and generation of unweighted events. We combine machine-learned multi-channel weights with a normal…

hep-ph2022★ 35 cited

Modern Machine Learning for LHC Physicists

Tilman Plehn, Anja Butter, Barry Dillon +3

Depending on the point of view, modern machine learning is either providing an unprecedented boost to the numerical methods of particle physics, or it is transforming the way we do…

hep-ph2022★ 41 cited

Two Invertible Networks for the Matrix Element Method

Anja Butter, Theo Heimel, Till Martini +2

The matrix element method is widely considered the ultimate LHC inference tool for small event numbers. We show how a combination of two conditional generative neural networks enco…

hep-ph2022★ 113 cited

Machine Learning and LHC Event Generation

Anja Butter, Tilman Plehn, Steffen Schumann +48

First-principle simulations are at the heart of the high-energy physics research program. They link the vast data output of multi-purpose detectors with fundamental theory predicti…

hep-ph2021★ 69 cited

Generative Networks for Precision Enthusiasts

Anja Butter, Theo Heimel, Sander Hummerich +4

Generative networks are opening new avenues in fast event generation for the LHC. We show how generative flow networks can reach percent-level precision for kinematic distributions…

hep-ph2020★ 39 cited

Measuring QCD Splittings with Invertible Networks

Sebastian Bieringer, Anja Butter, Theo Heimel +4

QCD splittings are among the most fundamental theory concepts at the LHC. We show how they can be studied systematically with the help of invertible neural networks. These networks…

hep-ph2018★ 163 cited

QCD or What?

Theo Heimel, Gregor Kasieczka, Tilman Plehn +1

Autoencoder networks, trained only on QCD jets, can be used to search for anomalies in jet-substructure. We show how, based either on images or on 4-vectors, they identify jets fro…