activity
20182021
most citedDo altmetrics work for assessing research quality?

48 citations · 113 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.DLShow all

8 papers · 1 filter

cs.DL2021

Open bibliographic data and the Italian National Scientific Qualification: measuring coverage of academic fields

Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni +1

The importance of open bibliographic repositories is widely accepted by the scientific community. For evaluation processes, however, there is still some skepticism: even if large r…

cs.DL2021

Academics evaluating academics: a methodology to inform the review process on top of open citations

Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni +1

In the past, several works have investigated ways for combining quantitative and qualitative methods in research assessment exercises. In this work, we aim at introducing a methodo…

cs.DL2021★ 9 cited

Does the Venue of Scientific Conferences Leverage their Impact? A Large Scale study on Computer Science Conferences

Luca Bedogni, Giacomo Cabri, Riccardo Martoglia +1

Background: Conferences bring scientists together and provide one of the most timely means for disseminating new ideas and cutting-edge works.The importance of conferences in scien…

cs.DL2021★ 2 cited

Can we assess research using open scientific knowledge graphs? A case study within the Italian National Scientific Qualification

Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni +1

The need for open scientific knowledge graphs is ever increasing. While there are large repositories of open access articles and free publication indexes, there are still few free…

cs.DL2021★ 8 cited

Do open citations give insights on the qualitative peer-review evaluation in research assessments? An analysis of the Italian National Scientific Qualification

Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni +1

In the past, several works have investigated ways for combining quantitative and qualitative methods in research assessment exercises. Indeed, the Italian National Scientific Quali…

cs.DL2019★ 31 cited

The practice of self-citations: a longitudinal study

Silvio Peroni, Paolo Ciancarini, Aldo Gangemi +3

In this article, we discuss the outcomes of an experiment where we analysed whether and to what extent the introduction, in 2012, of the new research assessment exercise in Italy (…

cs.DL2019★ 15 cited

Open data to evaluate academic researchers: an experiment with the Italian Scientific Habilitation

Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni, Francesco Poggi

The need for scholarly open data is ever increasing. While there are large repositories of open access articles and free publication indexes, there are still a few examples of free…

cs.DL2018★ 48 cited

Do altmetrics work for assessing research quality?

Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese, Paolo Ciancarini, Aldo Gangemi +3

Alternative metrics (aka altmetrics) are gaining increasing interest in the scientometrics community as they can capture both the volume and quality of attention that a research wo…