48 citations · 65 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
Academics evaluating academics: a methodology to inform the review process on top of open citations
Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni +1
In the past, several works have investigated ways for combining quantitative and qualitative methods in research assessment exercises. In this work, we aim at introducing a methodo…
Can we assess research using open scientific knowledge graphs? A case study within the Italian National Scientific Qualification
Federica Bologna, Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni +1
The need for open scientific knowledge graphs is ever increasing. While there are large repositories of open access articles and free publication indexes, there are still few free…
The practice of self-citations: a longitudinal study
Silvio Peroni, Paolo Ciancarini, Aldo Gangemi +3
In this article, we discuss the outcomes of an experiment where we analysed whether and to what extent the introduction, in 2012, of the new research assessment exercise in Italy (…
Open data to evaluate academic researchers: an experiment with the Italian Scientific Habilitation
Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni, Francesco Poggi
The need for scholarly open data is ever increasing. While there are large repositories of open access articles and free publication indexes, there are still a few examples of free…
Do altmetrics work for assessing research quality?
Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese, Paolo Ciancarini, Aldo Gangemi +3
Alternative metrics (aka altmetrics) are gaining increasing interest in the scientometrics community as they can capture both the volume and quality of attention that a research wo…