activity
20192026
most citedEscalation Risks from Language Models in Military and Diplomatic Decision-Making

44 citations · 145 across the 23 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

24 papers

cs.LG2026

From Constitutions to Control: Interpretable Rewards for Aligning Language Models

Johann D. Gaebler, Calvin Isley, Max Lamparth +2

Current approaches to aligning language models often make it hard to know what behavior is being rewarded or to change that reward in a targeted way. In particular, standard prefer…

cs.CL2026

Receptiveness, Not Sycophancy: Distinguishing Engagement from Deference in Language Models

Calvin Isley, Johann Gaebler, Max Lamparth +2

A central concern with language models is sycophancy: their tendency to defer to users' views at the expense of independent substantive judgment. In parallel, work on social sycoph…

cs.AI2026

Evaluation Cards: An Interpretive Layer for AI Evaluation Reporting

Avijit Ghosh, Anka Reuel, Jenny Chim +45

AI evaluation results are produced at scale but reported inconsistently across leaderboards, model cards, benchmark papers, and company blogs. The cost is interpretive: readers can…

cs.AI2026

Reward Bias Substitution: Single-Axis Bias Mitigations Redirect Optimization Pressure

Max Lamparth, Daniel Fein, Andreas Haupt +2

Single-axis mitigations of reward-model biases (e.g., reducing proxy reliance on length, sycophancy, or style) can rotate optimization pressure onto correlated proxies rather than…

cs.CL2026

One Bias After Another: Mechanistic Reward Shaping and Persistent Biases in Language Reward Models

Daniel Fein, Max Lamparth, Violet Xiang +2

Reward Models (RMs) are crucial for online alignment of language models (LMs) with human preferences. However, RM-based preference-tuning is vulnerable to reward hacking, whereby L…

cs.AI2026

Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing

Kiana Jafari, Paul Ulrich Nikolaus Rust, Duncan Eddy +7

Learning from human feedback~(LHF) assumes that expert judgments, appropriately aggregated, yield valid ground truth for training and evaluating AI systems. We tested this assumpti…

cs.CY2025★ 2 cited

Measuring and mitigating overreliance to build human-compatible AI

Lujain Ibrahim, Katherine M. Collins, Sunnie S. Y. Kim +14

Large language models (LLMs) distinguish themselves from previous technologies by functioning as collaborative ``thought partners,'' capable of engaging more fluidly in natural lan…

cs.MA2025★ 10 cited

Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI

Lewis Hammond, Alan Chan, Jesse Clifton +41

The rapid development of advanced AI agents and the imminent deployment of many instances of these agents will give rise to multi-agent systems of unprecedented complexity. These s…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Moving Beyond Medical Exams: A Clinician-Annotated Fairness Dataset of Real-World Tasks and Ambiguity in Mental Healthcare

Max Lamparth, Declan Grabb, Amy Franks +8

Current medical language model (LM) benchmarks often over-simplify the complexities of day-to-day clinical practice tasks and instead rely on evaluating LMs on multiple-choice boar…

cs.CY2025★ 1 cited

On the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models: Guideline, Assessment, and Perspective

Yue Huang, Chujie Gao, Siyuan Wu +63

Generative Foundation Models (GenFMs) have emerged as transformative tools. However, their widespread adoption raises critical concerns regarding trustworthiness across dimensions.…

cs.CY2025

Prioritization First, Principles Second: An Adaptive Interpretation of Helpful, Honest, and Harmless Principles

Yue Huang, Chujie Gao, Yujun Zhou +5

The Helpful, Honest, and Harmless (HHH) principle is a foundational framework for aligning AI systems with human values. However, existing interpretations of the HHH principle ofte…

cs.LG2025★ 23 cited

Humanity's Last Exam

Long Phan, Alice Gatti, Ziwen Han +1168

Benchmarks are important tools for tracking the rapid advancements in large language model (LLM) capabilities. However, benchmarks are not keeping pace in difficulty: LLMs now achi…

cs.AI2024★ 5 cited

BetterBench: Assessing AI Benchmarks, Uncovering Issues, and Establishing Best Practices

Anka Reuel, Amelia Hardy, Chandler Smith +3

AI models are increasingly prevalent in high-stakes environments, necessitating thorough assessment of their capabilities and risks. Benchmarks are popular for measuring these attr…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Measuring Free-Form Decision-Making Inconsistency of Language Models in Military Crisis Simulations

Aryan Shrivastava, Jessica Hullman, Max Lamparth

There is an increasing interest in using language models (LMs) for automated decision-making, with multiple countries actively testing LMs to aid in military crisis decision-making…

cs.CY2024★ 7 cited

Risks from Language Models for Automated Mental Healthcare: Ethics and Structure for Implementation

Declan Grabb, Max Lamparth, Nina Vasan

Amidst the growing interest in developing task-autonomous AI for automated mental health care, this paper addresses the ethical and practical challenges associated with the issue a…

cs.CL2024

Markovian Transformers for Informative Language Modeling

Scott Viteri, Max Lamparth, Peter Chatain +1

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning often fails to faithfully reflect a language model's underlying decision process. We address this by introducing a Markovian language model framewo…

cs.CY2024★ 4 cited

Human vs. Machine: Behavioral Differences Between Expert Humans and Language Models in Wargame Simulations

Max Lamparth, Anthony Corso, Jacob Ganz +3

To some, the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) promises better decision-making and increased military effectiveness while reducing the influence of human error and emotions. H…

cs.AI2024★ 44 cited

Escalation Risks from Language Models in Military and Diplomatic Decision-Making

Juan-Pablo Rivera, Gabriel Mukobi, Anka Reuel +3

Governments are increasingly considering integrating autonomous AI agents in high-stakes military and foreign-policy decision-making, especially with the emergence of advanced gene…

physics.ins-det2023★ 15 cited

TomOpt: Differential optimisation for task- and constraint-aware design of particle detectors in the context of muon tomography

Giles C. Strong, Maxime Lagrange, Aitor Orio +11

We describe a software package, TomOpt, developed to optimise the geometrical layout and specifications of detectors designed for tomography by scattering of cosmic-ray muons. The…

cs.LG2023★ 2 cited

Analyzing And Editing Inner Mechanisms Of Backdoored Language Models

Max Lamparth, Anka Reuel

Poisoning of data sets is a potential security threat to large language models that can lead to backdoored models. A description of the internal mechanisms of backdoored language m…

astro-ph.IM2022

Virgo: Scalable Unsupervised Classification of Cosmological Shock Waves

Max Lamparth, Ludwig Böss, Ulrich Steinwandel +1

Cosmological shock waves are essential to understanding the formation of cosmological structures. To study them, scientists run computationally expensive high-resolution 3D hydrody…

physics.data-an2022★ 3 cited

Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Optimization for High Precision Experiments

Max Lamparth, Mattis Bestehorn, Bastian Märkisch

High-precision measurements require optimal setups and analysis tools to achieve continuous improvements. Systematic corrections need to be modeled with high accuracy and known unc…

physics.ins-det2022★ 8 cited

Toward the End-to-End Optimization of Particle Physics Instruments with Differentiable Programming: a White Paper

Tommaso Dorigo, Andrea Giammanco, Pietro Vischia +33

The full optimization of the design and operation of instruments whose functioning relies on the interaction of radiation with matter is a super-human task, given the large dimensi…

physics.ins-det2019★ 18 cited

Design of the Magnet System of the Neutron Decay Facility PERC

Xiangzun Wang, Carmen Ziener, Hartmut Abele +27

The PERC (Proton and Electron Radiation Channel) facility is currently under construction at the research reactor FRM II, Garching. It will serve as an intense and clean source of…