28 citations · 85 across the 12 of their papers we have counts for
4 papers · 1 filter
How do Authors' Perceptions of their Papers Compare with Co-authors' Perceptions and Peer-review Decisions?
Charvi Rastogi, Ivan Stelmakh, Alina Beygelzimer +7
How do author perceptions match up to the outcomes of the peer-review process and perceptions of others? In a top-tier computer science conference (NeurIPS 2021) with more than 23,…
ASQA: Factoid Questions Meet Long-Form Answers
Ivan Stelmakh, Yi Luan, Bhuwan Dhingra +1
An abundance of datasets and availability of reliable evaluation metrics have resulted in strong progress in factoid question answering (QA). This progress, however, does not easil…
Cite-seeing and Reviewing: A Study on Citation Bias in Peer Review
Ivan Stelmakh, Charvi Rastogi, Ryan Liu +3
Citations play an important role in researchers' careers as a key factor in evaluation of scientific impact. Many anecdotes advice authors to exploit this fact and cite prospective…
To ArXiv or not to ArXiv: A Study Quantifying Pros and Cons of Posting Preprints Online
Charvi Rastogi, Ivan Stelmakh, Xinwei Shen +4
Double-blind conferences have engaged in debates over whether to allow authors to post their papers online on arXiv or elsewhere during the review process. Independently, some auth…