activity
20182024
most citedOn the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models

2.3k citations · 3.1k across the 28 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

29 papers

cs.CL2024★ 28 cited

Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inference

Benjamin Warner, Antoine Chaffin, Benjamin Clavié +11

Encoder-only transformer models such as BERT offer a great performance-size tradeoff for retrieval and classification tasks with respect to larger decoder-only models. Despite bein…

cs.CL2024

Incorporating Human Explanations for Robust Hate Speech Detection

Jennifer L. Chen, Faisal Ladhak, Daniel Li +1

Given the black-box nature and complexity of large transformer language models (LM), concerns about generalizability and robustness present ethical implications for domains such as…

cs.CL2024

PERSONA: A Reproducible Testbed for Pluralistic Alignment

Louis Castricato, Nathan Lile, Rafael Rafailov +2

The rapid advancement of language models (LMs) necessitates robust alignment with diverse user values. However, current preference optimization approaches often fail to capture the…

cs.AI2024

STORYSUMM: Evaluating Faithfulness in Story Summarization

Melanie Subbiah, Faisal Ladhak, Akankshya Mishra +3

Human evaluation has been the gold standard for checking faithfulness in abstractive summarization. However, with a challenging source domain like narrative, multiple annotators ca…

cs.CL2024

Aligning Large Language Models via Fine-grained Supervision

Dehong Xu, Liang Qiu, Minseok Kim +2

Pre-trained large-scale language models (LLMs) excel at producing coherent articles, yet their outputs may be untruthful, toxic, or fail to align with user expectations. Current ap…

cs.CL2023★ 5 cited

Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Models

Yonatan Oren, Nicole Meister, Niladri Chatterji +2

Large language models are trained on vast amounts of internet data, prompting concerns and speculation that they have memorized public benchmarks. Going from speculation to proof o…

cs.CL2023★ 6 cited

From Sparse to Dense: GPT-4 Summarization with Chain of Density Prompting

Griffin Adams, Alexander Fabbri, Faisal Ladhak +2

Selecting the ``right'' amount of information to include in a summary is a difficult task. A good summary should be detailed and entity-centric without being overly dense and hard…

cs.CL2023

Generating EDU Extracts for Plan-Guided Summary Re-Ranking

Griffin Adams, Alexander R. Fabbri, Faisal Ladhak +2

Two-step approaches, in which summary candidates are generated-then-reranked to return a single summary, can improve ROUGE scores over the standard single-step approach. Yet, stand…

cs.CL2023★ 101 cited

Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?

Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak +3

Language models (LMs) are increasingly being used in open-ended contexts, where the opinions reflected by LMs in response to subjective queries can have a profound impact, both on…

cs.CL2023★ 64 cited

Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarization

Tianyi Zhang, Faisal Ladhak, Esin Durmus +3

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for automatic summarization but the reasons behind their successes are poorly understood. By conducting a human evaluation on ten LL…

cs.CL2022★ 4 cited

CREATIVESUMM: Shared Task on Automatic Summarization for Creative Writing

Divyansh Agarwal, Alexander R. Fabbri, Simeng Han +7

This paper introduces the shared task of summarizing documents in several creative domains, namely literary texts, movie scripts, and television scripts. Summarizing these creative…

cs.CL2022

Contrastive Error Attribution for Finetuned Language Models

Faisal Ladhak, Esin Durmus, Tatsunori Hashimoto

Recent work has identified noisy and misannotated data as a core cause of hallucinations and unfaithful outputs in Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks. Consequently, identifyin…

cs.CL2022★ 57 cited

Evaluating Human-Language Model Interaction

Mina Lee, Megha Srivastava, Amelia Hardy +15

Many real-world applications of language models (LMs), such as writing assistance and code autocomplete, involve human-LM interaction. However, most benchmarks are non-interactive…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

Novel Chapter Abstractive Summarization using Spinal Tree Aware Sub-Sentential Content Selection

Hardy Hardy, Miguel Ballesteros, Faisal Ladhak +3

Summarizing novel chapters is a difficult task due to the input length and the fact that sentences that appear in the desired summaries draw content from multiple places throughout…

cs.CL2022★ 128 cited

Holistic Evaluation of Language Models

Percy Liang, Rishi Bommasani, Tony Lee +47

Language models (LMs) are becoming the foundation for almost all major language technologies, but their capabilities, limitations, and risks are not well understood. We present Hol…

cs.CL2022★ 298 cited

Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scale

Federico Bianchi, Pratyusha Kalluri, Esin Durmus +7

Machine learning models that convert user-written text descriptions into images are now widely available online and used by millions of users to generate millions of images a day.…

cs.CL2022★ 3 cited

GEMv2: Multilingual NLG Benchmarking in a Single Line of Code

Sebastian Gehrmann, Abhik Bhattacharjee, Abinaya Mahendiran +74

Evaluation in machine learning is usually informed by past choices, for example which datasets or metrics to use. This standardization enables the comparison on equal footing using…

cs.CL2022

Spurious Correlations in Reference-Free Evaluation of Text Generation

Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Tatsunori Hashimoto

Model-based, reference-free evaluation metrics have been proposed as a fast and cost-effective approach to evaluate Natural Language Generation (NLG) systems. Despite promising rec…

cs.CL2021

Faithful or Extractive? On Mitigating the Faithfulness-Abstractiveness Trade-off in Abstractive Summarization

Faisal Ladhak, Esin Durmus, He He +2

Despite recent progress in abstractive summarization, systems still suffer from faithfulness errors. While prior work has proposed models that improve faithfulness, it is unclear w…

cs.LG2021★ 2.3k cited

On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models

Rishi Bommasani, Drew A. Hudson, Ehsan Adeli +111

AI is undergoing a paradigm shift with the rise of models (e.g., BERT, DALL-E, GPT-3) that are trained on broad data at scale and are adaptable to a wide range of downstream tasks.…

cs.CL2021

Segmenting Subtitles for Correcting ASR Segmentation Errors

David Wan, Chris Kedzie, Faisal Ladhak +6

Typical ASR systems segment the input audio into utterances using purely acoustic information, which may not resemble the sentence-like units that are expected by conventional mach…

cs.CL2021★ 52 cited

The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metrics

Sebastian Gehrmann, Tosin Adewumi, Karmanya Aggarwal +53

We introduce GEM, a living benchmark for natural language Generation (NLG), its Evaluation, and Metrics. Measuring progress in NLG relies on a constantly evolving ecosystem of auto…

cs.CL2020

To BERT or Not to BERT: Comparing Task-specific and Task-agnostic Semi-Supervised Approaches for Sequence Tagging

Kasturi Bhattacharjee, Miguel Ballesteros, Rishita Anubhai +4

Leveraging large amounts of unlabeled data using Transformer-like architectures, like BERT, has gained popularity in recent times owing to their effectiveness in learning general r…

cs.CL2020★ 4 cited

Incorporating Terminology Constraints in Automatic Post-Editing

David Wan, Chris Kedzie, Faisal Ladhak +2

Users of machine translation (MT) may want to ensure the use of specific lexical terminologies. While there exist techniques for incorporating terminology constraints during infere…