activity
20182020
most citedWhy Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AI

53 citations · 74 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

cs.AI202014 cited

What Did You Think Would Happen? Explaining Agent Behaviour Through Intended Outcomes

Herman Yau, Chris Russell, Simon Hadfield

We present a novel form of explanation for Reinforcement Learning, based around the notion of intended outcome. These explanations describe the outcome an agent is trying to achiev…

cs.AI202053 cited

Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AI

Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt, Chris Russell

This article identifies a critical incompatibility between European notions of discrimination and existing statistical measures of fairness. First, we review the evidential require…

cs.LG20197 cited

Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanations

Chris Russell

This paper proposes new search algorithms for counterfactual explanations based upon mixed integer programming. We are concerned with complex data in which variables may take any v…

cs.AI2018

Explaining Explanations in AI

Brent Mittelstadt, Chris Russell, Sandra Wachter

Recent work on interpretability in machine learning and AI has focused on the building of simplified models that approximate the true criteria used to make decisions. These models…

stat.ML2018

Causal Interventions for Fairness

Matt J. Kusner, Chris Russell, Joshua R. Loftus +1

Most approaches in algorithmic fairness constrain machine learning methods so the resulting predictions satisfy one of several intuitive notions of fairness. While this may help pr…

cs.AI2018

Causal Reasoning for Algorithmic Fairness

Joshua R. Loftus, Chris Russell, Matt J. Kusner +1

In this work, we argue for the importance of causal reasoning in creating fair algorithms for decision making. We give a review of existing approaches to fairness, describe work in…