activity
20182026
most citedPathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretations Difficult

259 citations · 298 across the 21 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

23 papers

cs.CL2026

VibeJam: A User Study Platform for Web Development with Agents

Nishant Balepur, Connor Baumler, Valerie Chen +3

Programming with AI is increasingly agentic, users prompt LLMs to directly edit their code and review the changes, with adoption growing especially for web development tasks. Despi…

cs.CL2026

Check The Scoreboard: An Analysis of Scoring Schemes on Multiple-Choice Evaluation

Nishant Balepur, Paiheng Xu, Wei Ai +3

Multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) benchmarks in NLP use number-right scoring (accuracy), but in educational testing, the scoring scheme, the combination of the response mod…

cs.CL2026

(Im)Paired Programming: Coding Agents Improve Productivity but Harm Understanding

Nishant Balepur, Connor Baumler, Valerie Chen +3

Coding agents (e.g., Cursor) improve developer productivity by optimizing task completion, but shifting users from writing code to prompting and reviewing may harm their understand…

cs.HC2026

It Matters How You Say It: Exploring Rhetorical Patterns for AI-Assisted Information Evaluation

Sadra Sabouri, Zeinabsadat Saghi, Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber +3

Prior work on AI-assisted information evaluation has largely focused on what AI systems communicate, comparing explanation types and formats, with responses predominantly cast in d…

cs.CL2026

Measuring User's Mental Models of Speech Translation in Human-AI Collaboration

HyoJung Han, Nishant Balepur, Jordan Boyd-Graber +1

Millions of people use machine translation (MT) tools daily, yet little is known about their perception of what systems can and cannot do. This paper studies users' mental models o…

cs.CL2026

DRACULA: Hunting for the Actions Users Want Deep Research Agents to Execute

Nishant Balepur, Malachi Hamada, Varsha Kishore +9

Scientific Deep Research (DR) agents answer user queries by synthesizing research papers into multi-section reports. User feedback can improve their utility, but existing protocols…

cs.CL2026

Language Models Don't Know What You Want: Evaluating Personalization in Deep Research Needs Real Users

Nishant Balepur, Malachi Hamada, Varsha Kishore +7

Deep Research (DR) systems help researchers cope with ballooning publishing counts. Such tools synthesize scientific papers to answer research queries, but lack understanding of th…

cs.CL2026

BenchMarker: An Education-Inspired Toolkit for Highlighting Flaws in Multiple-Choice Benchmarks

Nishant Balepur, Bhavya Rajasekaran, Jane Oh +7

Multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) is standard in NLP, but benchmarks lack rigorous quality control. We present BenchMarker, an education-inspired toolkit using LLM judges t…

cs.CL2025

A Good Plan is Hard to Find: Aligning Models with Preferences is Misaligned with What Helps Users

Nishant Balepur, Matthew Shu, Yoo Yeon Sung +5

To assist users in complex tasks, LLMs generate plans: step-by-step instructions towards a goal. While alignment methods aim to ensure LLM plans are helpful, they train (RLHF) or e…

cs.CL2025

Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Above

Nishant Balepur, Rachel Rudinger, Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber

Multiple choice question answering (MCQA) is popular for LLM evaluation due to its simplicity and human-like testing, but we argue for its reform. We first reveal flaws in MCQA's f…

cs.CL2025

MODS: Moderating a Mixture of Document Speakers to Summarize Debatable Queries in Document Collections

Nishant Balepur, Alexa Siu, Nedim Lipka +4

Query-focused summarization (QFS) gives a summary of documents to answer a query. Past QFS work assumes queries have one answer, ignoring debatable ones (Is law school worth it?).…

cs.CL2025

Whose Boat Does it Float? Improving Personalization in Preference Tuning via Inferred User Personas

Nishant Balepur, Vishakh Padmakumar, Fumeng Yang +3

LLMs are aligned to follow input instructions by learning which of two responses users prefer for a prompt. However, such preference data do not convey why users prefer responses t…

cs.CL2024

Reverse Question Answering: Can an LLM Write a Question so Hard (or Bad) that it Can't Answer?

Nishant Balepur, Feng Gu, Abhilasha Ravichander +3

Question answering (QA), giving correct answers to questions, is a popular task, but we test reverse question answering (RQA): for an input answer, give a question with that answer…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

A SMART Mnemonic Sounds like "Glue Tonic": Mixing LLMs with Student Feedback to Make Mnemonic Learning Stick

Nishant Balepur, Matthew Shu, Alexander Hoyle +4

Keyword mnemonics are memorable explanations that link new terms to simpler keywords. Prior work generates mnemonics for students, but they do not train models using mnemonics stud…

cs.CL2024

KARL: Knowledge-Aware Retrieval and Representations aid Retention and Learning in Students

Matthew Shu, Nishant Balepur, Shi Feng +1

Flashcard schedulers rely on 1) student models to predict the flashcards a student knows; and 2) teaching policies to pick which cards to show next via these predictions. Prior stu…

cs.CL2023

Pregnant Questions: The Importance of Pragmatic Awareness in Maternal Health Question Answering

Neha Srikanth, Rupak Sarkar, Heran Mane +4

Questions posed by information-seeking users often contain implicit false or potentially harmful assumptions. In a high-risk domain such as maternal and infant health, a question-a…

cs.CL2019

Mitigating Noisy Inputs for Question Answering

Denis Peskov, Joe Barrow, Pedro Rodriguez +2

Natural language processing systems are often downstream of unreliable inputs: machine translation, optical character recognition, or speech recognition. For instance, virtual assi…

cs.LG2019★ 6 cited

Misleading Failures of Partial-input Baselines

Shi Feng, Eric Wallace, Jordan Boyd-Graber

Recent work establishes dataset difficulty and removes annotation artifacts via partial-input baselines (e.g., hypothesis-only models for SNLI or question-only models for VQA). Whe…

cs.CL2019★ 7 cited

Quizbowl: The Case for Incremental Question Answering

Pedro Rodriguez, Shi Feng, Mohit Iyyer +2

Scholastic trivia competitions test knowledge and intelligence through mastery of question answering. Modern question answering benchmarks are one variant of the Turing test. Speci…

cs.AI2018★ 24 cited

What can AI do for me: Evaluating Machine Learning Interpretations in Cooperative Play

Shi Feng, Jordan Boyd-Graber

Machine learning is an important tool for decision making, but its ethical and responsible application requires rigorous vetting of its interpretability and utility: an understudie…

cs.CL2018

Interpreting Neural Networks With Nearest Neighbors

Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Jordan Boyd-Graber

Local model interpretation methods explain individual predictions by assigning an importance value to each input feature. This value is often determined by measuring the change in…

cs.CL2018

Trick Me If You Can: Human-in-the-loop Generation of Adversarial Examples for Question Answering

Eric Wallace, Pedro Rodriguez, Shi Feng +2

Adversarial evaluation stress tests a model's understanding of natural language. While past approaches expose superficial patterns, the resulting adversarial examples are limited i…

cs.CL2018★ 259 cited

Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretations Difficult

Shi Feng, Eric Wallace, Alvin Grissom +3

One way to interpret neural model predictions is to highlight the most important input features---for example, a heatmap visualization over the words in an input sentence. In exist…