activity
19982007
most citedActivated Transport in the individual Layers that form the =1 Exciton Condensate

124 citations · 291 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

8 papers

cond-mat.mes-hall2007★ 46 cited

Exciton condensate at a total filling factor of 1 in Corbino 2D electron bilayers

L. Tiemann, J. G. S. Lok, W. Dietsche +4

Magneto-transport and drag measurements on a quasi-Corbino 2D electron bilayer at the systems total filling factor 1 (v_tot=1) reveal a drag voltage that is equal in magnitude to t…

cond-mat.mes-hall2005★ 53 cited

Electron spin resonance on a 2-dimensional electron gas in a single AlAs quantum well

M. Schulte, J. G. S. Lok, G. Denninger +1

Direct electron spin resonance (ESR) on a high mobility two dimensional electron gas in a single AlAs quantum well reveals an electronic -factor of 1.991 at 9.35 GHz and 1.989 a…

cond-mat.mes-hall2004★ 124 cited

Activated Transport in the individual Layers that form the =1 Exciton Condensate

R. D. Wiersma, J. G. S. Lok, S. Kraus +6

We observe the total filling factor =1 quantum Hall state in a bilayer two-dimensional electron system with virtually no tunnelling. We find thermally activated transport in…

cond-mat.mes-hall2003★ 16 cited

Coulomb Drag as a Probe of the Nature of Compressible States in a Magnetic Field

K. Muraki, J. G. S. Lok, S. Kraus +5

Magneto-drag reveals the nature of compressible states and the underlying interplay of disorder and interactions. At ν=3/2 a clear T^{4/3} dependence is observed, which signifies t…

cond-mat.mes-hall2001★ 26 cited

Closely spaced and separately contacted 2d electron and 2d hole gases by in situ focussed ion implantation

M. Pohlt, M. Lynass, J. G. S. Lok +4

Separately contacted double layers of a 2d electron - 2d hole gases have been prepared in GaAs separated by thin AlGaAs barriers with thicknesses down to 15 nm. The molecular-beam-…

cond-mat.mes-hall2001★ 1 cited

Comment on 'Missing 2 Response for Composite Fermions in Phonon Drag'

U. Zeitler, J. G. S. Lok

A Comment on the Letter by S. Zelakiewicz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1942 (2000).