activity
20172026
most citedInverse Reward Design

61 citations · 252 across the 19 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

23 papers

cs.GT2026

Social Choice Foundations for Simulation-Augmented Generation

Sonja Kraiczy, Smitha Milli, Ratip Emin Berker +6

Simulation-augmented generation (SAGE) is a recent technical proposal in which models simulate individuals' viewpoints at inference time in order to provide more representative ans…

cs.CY2026

Muse Spark Safety & Preparedness Report

Cristina Menghini, Peter Ney, Hamza Kwisaba +117

Muse Spark is the latest large language model developed by Meta. In this report, we first present evaluations for catastrophic risk domains under Meta's Advanced AI Scaling Framewo…

cs.SI2026★ 1 cited

The Prosocial Ranking Challenge: Reducing Polarization on Social Media without Sacrificing Engagement

Jonathan Stray, Ian Baker, George Beknazar-Yuzbashev +41

We report the first direct comparisons of multiple alternative social media algorithms on multiple platforms on outcomes of societal interest. We used a browser extension to modify…

cs.AI2025

Question the Questions: Auditing Representation in Online Deliberative Processes

Soham De, Lodewijk Gelauff, Ashish Goel +3

A central feature of many deliberative processes, such as citizens' assemblies and deliberative polls, is the opportunity for participants to engage directly with experts. While pa…

cs.AI2025

CTRL-Rec: Controlling Recommender Systems With Natural Language

Micah Carroll, Adeline Foote, Kevin Feng +4

When users are dissatisfied with recommendations from a recommender system, they often lack fine-grained controls for changing them. Large language models (LLMs) offer a solution b…

cs.CL2025

What's In My Human Feedback? Learning Interpretable Descriptions of Preference Data

Rajiv Movva, Smitha Milli, Sewon Min +1

Human feedback can alter language models in unpredictable and undesirable ways, as practitioners lack a clear understanding of what feedback data encodes. While prior work studies…

cs.LG2025★ 1 cited

Cultivating Pluralism In Algorithmic Monoculture: The Community Alignment Dataset

Lily Hong Zhang, Smitha Milli, Karen Jusko +12

How can large language models (LLMs) serve users with varying preferences that may conflict across cultural, political, or other dimensions? To advance this challenge, this paper e…

cs.SI2025

Representative Ranking for Deliberation in the Public Sphere

Manon Revel, Smitha Milli, Tyler Lu +2

Online comment sections, such as those on news sites or social media, have the potential to foster informal public deliberation, However, this potential is often undermined by the…

cs.CY2024★ 3 cited

Democratic AI is Possible. The Democracy Levels Framework Shows How It Might Work

Aviv Ovadya, Kyle Redman, Luke Thorburn +11

This position paper argues that effectively "democratizing AI" requires democratic governance and alignment of AI, and that this is particularly valuable for decisions with systemi…

cs.SI2024★ 7 cited

What We Know About Using Non-Engagement Signals in Content Ranking

Tom Cunningham, Sana Pandey, Leif Sigerson +7

Many online platforms predominantly rank items by predicted user engagement. We believe that there is much unrealized potential in including non-engagement signals, which can impro…

cs.LG2023★ 2 cited

Choosing the Right Weights: Balancing Value, Strategy, and Noise in Recommender Systems

Smitha Milli, Emma Pierson, Nikhil Garg

Many recommender systems optimize a linear weighting of different user behaviors, such as clicks, likes, and shares. We analyze the optimal choice of weights from the perspectives…

cs.SI2023★ 36 cited

Engagement, User Satisfaction, and the Amplification of Divisive Content on Social Media

Smitha Milli, Micah Carroll, Yike Wang +3

In a pre-registered algorithmic audit, we found that, relative to a reverse-chronological baseline, Twitter's engagement-based ranking algorithm amplifies emotionally charged, out-…

cs.LG2021★ 1 cited

Causal Inference Struggles with Agency on Online Platforms

Smitha Milli, Luca Belli, Moritz Hardt

Online platforms regularly conduct randomized experiments to understand how changes to the platform causally affect various outcomes of interest. However, experimentation on online…

cs.SI2020★ 47 cited

From Optimizing Engagement to Measuring Value

Smitha Milli, Luca Belli, Moritz Hardt

Most recommendation engines today are based on predicting user engagement, e.g. predicting whether a user will click on an item or not. However, there is potentially a large gap be…

cs.LG2020★ 56 cited

Reward-rational (implicit) choice: A unifying formalism for reward learning

Hong Jun Jeon, Smitha Milli, Anca D. Dragan

It is often difficult to hand-specify what the correct reward function is for a task, so researchers have instead aimed to learn reward functions from human behavior or feedback. T…

cs.LG2019

Value-laden Disciplinary Shifts in Machine Learning

Ravit Dotan, Smitha Milli

As machine learning models are increasingly used for high-stakes decision making, scholars have sought to intervene to ensure that such models do not encode undesirable social and…

cs.LG2019★ 22 cited

Strategic Classification is Causal Modeling in Disguise

John Miller, Smitha Milli, Moritz Hardt

Consequential decision-making incentivizes individuals to strategically adapt their behavior to the specifics of the decision rule. While a long line of work has viewed strategic a…

cs.AI2019★ 3 cited

Literal or Pedagogic Human? Analyzing Human Model Misspecification in Objective Learning

Smitha Milli, Anca D. Dragan

It is incredibly easy for a system designer to misspecify the objective for an autonomous system ("robot''), thus motivating the desire to have the robot learn the objective from h…

cs.LG2018★ 2 cited

The Social Cost of Strategic Classification

Smitha Milli, John Miller, Anca D. Dragan +1

Consequential decision-making typically incentivizes individuals to behave strategically, tailoring their behavior to the specifics of the decision rule. A long line of work has th…

stat.ML2018

Model Reconstruction from Model Explanations

Smitha Milli, Ludwig Schmidt, Anca D. Dragan +1

We show through theory and experiment that gradient-based explanations of a model quickly reveal the model itself. Our results speak to a tension between the desire to keep a propr…

cs.AI2017★ 61 cited

Inverse Reward Design

Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Smitha Milli, Pieter Abbeel +2

Autonomous agents optimize the reward function we give them. What they don't know is how hard it is for us to design a reward function that actually captures what we want. When des…

cs.AI2017★ 10 cited

Interpretable and Pedagogical Examples

Smitha Milli, Pieter Abbeel, Igor Mordatch

Teachers intentionally pick the most informative examples to show their students. However, if the teacher and student are neural networks, the examples that the teacher network lea…

cs.AI2017

Should Robots be Obedient?

Smitha Milli, Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Anca Dragan +1

Intuitively, obedience -- following the order that a human gives -- seems like a good property for a robot to have. But, we humans are not perfect and we may give orders that are n…