activity
20172026
most citedStress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inference

41 citations · 174 across the 34 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2024Show all

9 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2024

RESTOR: Knowledge Recovery in Machine Unlearning

Keivan Rezaei, Khyathi Chandu, Soheil Feizi +3

Large language models trained on web-scale corpora can memorize undesirable data containing misinformation, copyrighted material, or private or sensitive information. Recently, sev…

cs.CL2024

Reverse Question Answering: Can an LLM Write a Question so Hard (or Bad) that it Can't Answer?

Nishant Balepur, Feng Gu, Abhilasha Ravichander +3

Question answering (QA), giving correct answers to questions, is a popular task, but we test reverse question answering (RQA): for an input answer, give a question with that answer…

cs.CL2024★ 5 cited

WildHallucinations: Evaluating Long-form Factuality in LLMs with Real-World Entity Queries

Wenting Zhao, Tanya Goyal, Yu Ying Chiu +8

While hallucinations of large language models (LLMs) prevail as a major challenge, existing evaluation benchmarks on factuality do not cover the diverse domains of knowledge that t…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

The Art of Saying No: Contextual Noncompliance in Language Models

Faeze Brahman, Sachin Kumar, Vidhisha Balachandran +11

Chat-based language models are designed to be helpful, yet they should not comply with every user request. While most existing work primarily focuses on refusal of "unsafe" queries…

cs.CL2024★ 4 cited

WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wild

Bill Yuchen Lin, Yuntian Deng, Khyathi Chandu +6

We introduce WildBench, an automated evaluation framework designed to benchmark large language models (LLMs) using challenging, real-world user queries. WildBench consists of 1,024…

cs.CL2024

BEAR: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Relational Knowledge in Causal and Masked Language Models

Jacek Wiland, Max Ploner, Alan Akbik

Knowledge probing assesses to which degree a language model (LM) has successfully learned relational knowledge during pre-training. Probing is an inexpensive way to compare LMs of…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Artifacts or Abduction: How Do LLMs Answer Multiple-Choice Questions Without the Question?

Nishant Balepur, Abhilasha Ravichander, Rachel Rudinger

Multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) is often used to evaluate large language models (LLMs). To see if MCQA assesses LLMs as intended, we probe if LLMs can perform MCQA with c…

cs.CL2024★ 11 cited

OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Models

Dirk Groeneveld, Iz Beltagy, Pete Walsh +40

Language models (LMs) have become ubiquitous in both NLP research and in commercial product offerings. As their commercial importance has surged, the most powerful models have beco…

cs.CL2024★ 10 cited

Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Research

Luca Soldaini, Rodney Kinney, Akshita Bhagia +33

Information about pretraining corpora used to train the current best-performing language models is seldom discussed: commercial models rarely detail their data, and even open model…