activity
20172026
most citedStress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inference

41 citations · 174 across the 34 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

38 papers

cs.AI2026

Characterizing Web Search by Conversational LLM Agents: From Search Decisions and Strategies to Results and Responses

Mahsa Amani, Seungeon Lee, Abhisek Dash +9

Conversational LLM agents increasingly rely on Web search, yet the end-to-end lifecycle of agentic search remains poorly understood. We present the first study of Web search across…

cs.CY2026

Human-AI Co-Creativity: Advances, Opportunities, and Challenges

Adish Singla, Abhilasha Ravichander, Liwei Jiang +7

This survey article has grown out of the human-AI co-creativity workshop organized by the authors at the ICML 2026 conference. We organized this workshop as part of a community-bui…

cs.AI2026

To Call or Not to Call: A Framework to Assess and Optimize LLM Tool Calling

Qinyuan Wu, Soumi Das, Mahsa Amani +5

Agentic AI architectures augment LLMs with external tools, unlocking strong capabilities but potentially incurring substantial costs. Moreover, tool use is not always beneficial: r…

cs.LG2026

Fractional Rotation, Full Potential? Investigating Performance and Convergence of Partial RoPE

Mohammad Aflah Khan, Krishna P. Gummadi, Manish Gupta +1

Rotary Positional Embedding (RoPE) is widely used in transformers to encode relative positional information, yet the effect of applying RoPE to only a subset of hidden dimensions r…

cs.CL2026

In Agents We Trust, but Who Do Agents Trust? Latent Source Preferences Steer LLM Generations

Mohammad Aflah Khan, Mahsa Amani, Soumi Das +5

Agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being deployed as interfaces to information on online platforms. These agents filter, prioritize, and synthesize infor…

cs.CL2025

The Curious Case of Factuality Finetuning: Models' Internal Beliefs Can Improve Factuality

Benjamin Newman, Abhilasha Ravichander, Jaehun Jung +5

Language models are prone to hallucination - generating text that is factually incorrect. Finetuning models on high-quality factual information can potentially reduce hallucination…

cs.LG2025

Revisiting the Past: Data Unlearning with Model State History

Keivan Rezaei, Mehrdad Saberi, Abhilasha Ravichander +1

Large language models are trained on massive corpora of web data, which may include private data, copyrighted material, factually inaccurate data, or data that degrades model perfo…

cs.CL2025

What Has Been Lost with Synthetic Evaluation?

Alexander Gill, Abhilasha Ravichander, Ana Marasović

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for data generation. However, creating evaluation benchmarks raises the bar for this emerging paradigm. Benchmarks must target sp…

cs.CL2025

Why and How LLMs Hallucinate: Connecting the Dots with Subsequence Associations

Yiyou Sun, Yu Gai, Lijie Chen +3

Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate hallucinations-content that deviates from factual accuracy or provided context-posing challenges for diagnosis due to the complex i…

cs.CL2025

Information-Guided Identification of Training Data Imprint in (Proprietary) Large Language Models

Abhilasha Ravichander, Jillian Fisher, Taylor Sorensen +6

High-quality training data has proven crucial for developing performant large language models (LLMs). However, commercial LLM providers disclose few, if any, details about the data…

cs.CL2025★ 3 cited

HALoGEN: Fantastic LLM Hallucinations and Where to Find Them

Abhilasha Ravichander, Shrusti Ghela, David Wadden +1

Despite their impressive ability to generate high-quality and fluent text, generative large language models (LLMs) also produce hallucinations: statements that are misaligned with…

cs.CL2024

RESTOR: Knowledge Recovery in Machine Unlearning

Keivan Rezaei, Khyathi Chandu, Soheil Feizi +3

Large language models trained on web-scale corpora can memorize undesirable data containing misinformation, copyrighted material, or private or sensitive information. Recently, sev…

cs.CL2024

Reverse Question Answering: Can an LLM Write a Question so Hard (or Bad) that it Can't Answer?

Nishant Balepur, Feng Gu, Abhilasha Ravichander +3

Question answering (QA), giving correct answers to questions, is a popular task, but we test reverse question answering (RQA): for an input answer, give a question with that answer…

cs.CL2024★ 5 cited

WildHallucinations: Evaluating Long-form Factuality in LLMs with Real-World Entity Queries

Wenting Zhao, Tanya Goyal, Yu Ying Chiu +8

While hallucinations of large language models (LLMs) prevail as a major challenge, existing evaluation benchmarks on factuality do not cover the diverse domains of knowledge that t…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

The Art of Saying No: Contextual Noncompliance in Language Models

Faeze Brahman, Sachin Kumar, Vidhisha Balachandran +11

Chat-based language models are designed to be helpful, yet they should not comply with every user request. While most existing work primarily focuses on refusal of "unsafe" queries…

cs.CL2024★ 4 cited

WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wild

Bill Yuchen Lin, Yuntian Deng, Khyathi Chandu +6

We introduce WildBench, an automated evaluation framework designed to benchmark large language models (LLMs) using challenging, real-world user queries. WildBench consists of 1,024…

cs.CL2024

BEAR: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Relational Knowledge in Causal and Masked Language Models

Jacek Wiland, Max Ploner, Alan Akbik

Knowledge probing assesses to which degree a language model (LM) has successfully learned relational knowledge during pre-training. Probing is an inexpensive way to compare LMs of…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Artifacts or Abduction: How Do LLMs Answer Multiple-Choice Questions Without the Question?

Nishant Balepur, Abhilasha Ravichander, Rachel Rudinger

Multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) is often used to evaluate large language models (LLMs). To see if MCQA assesses LLMs as intended, we probe if LLMs can perform MCQA with c…

cs.CL2024★ 11 cited

OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Models

Dirk Groeneveld, Iz Beltagy, Pete Walsh +40

Language models (LMs) have become ubiquitous in both NLP research and in commercial product offerings. As their commercial importance has surged, the most powerful models have beco…

cs.CL2024★ 10 cited

Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Research

Luca Soldaini, Rodney Kinney, Akshita Bhagia +33

Information about pretraining corpora used to train the current best-performing language models is seldom discussed: commercial models rarely detail their data, and even open model…

cs.CL2023★ 10 cited

The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learning

Bill Yuchen Lin, Abhilasha Ravichander, Ximing Lu +5

The alignment tuning process of large language models (LLMs) typically involves instruction learning through supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and preference tuning via reinforcement le…

cs.CL2023★ 4 cited

MacGyver: Are Large Language Models Creative Problem Solvers?

Yufei Tian, Abhilasha Ravichander, Lianhui Qin +6

We explore the creative problem-solving capabilities of modern LLMs in a novel constrained setting. To this end, we create MACGYVER, an automatically generated dataset consisting o…

cs.AI2023★ 2 cited

Agent Lumos: Unified and Modular Training for Open-Source Language Agents

Da Yin, Faeze Brahman, Abhilasha Ravichander +4

Closed-source agents suffer from several issues such as a lack of affordability, transparency, and reproducibility, particularly on complex interactive tasks. This motivates the de…

cs.AI2023★ 10 cited

The Generative AI Paradox: "What It Can Create, It May Not Understand"

Peter West, Ximing Lu, Nouha Dziri +11

The recent wave of generative AI has sparked unprecedented global attention, with both excitement and concern over potentially superhuman levels of artificial intelligence: models…