Security of quantum key distribution using weak coherent states with nonrandom phases

Abstract

We prove the security of the Bennett-Brassard (BB84) quantum key distribution protocol in the case where the key information is encoded in the relative phase of a coherent-state reference pulse and a weak coherent-state signal pulse, as in some practical implementations of the protocol. In contrast to previous work, our proof applies even if the eavesdropper knows the phase of the reference pulse, provided that this phase is not modulated by the source, and even if the reference pulse is bright. The proof also applies to the case where the key is encoded in the photon polarization of a weak coherent-state pulse with a known phase, but only if the phases of the four BB84 signal states are judiciously chosen. The achievable key generation rate scales quadratically with the transmission in the channel, just as for BB84 with phase-randomized weak coherent-state signals (when decoy states are not used). For the case where the phase of the reference pulse is strongly modulated by the source, we exhibit an explicit attack that allows the eavesdropper to learn every key bit in a parameter regime where a protocol using phase-randomized signals is provably secure.

supersedes quant-ph/0504209. (v2): 28 pages, uses qic.sty. Further discussion of universal composability and of the double Mach-Zehnder scheme

References in corpus (29)

• Quantum Cryptography
• Simple Proof of Security of the BB84 Quantum Key Distribution Protocol
• Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution
• Unconditional Security Of Quantum Key Distribution Over Arbitrarily Long Distances
• Quantum Key Distribution with High Loss: Toward Global Secure Communication
• Beating the PNS attack in practical quantum cryptography
• Quantum cryptography protocols robust against photon number splitting attacks for weak laser pulses implementations
• Trojan Horse attacks on Quantum Key Distribution systems
• An information-theoretic security proof for QKD protocols
• Effects of detector efficiency mismatch on security of quantum cryptosystems
• Lower and upper bounds on the secret key rate for QKD protocols using one--way classical communication
• A decoy-state protocol for quantum cryptography with 4 intensities of coherent states
• One-and-a-half quantum de Finetti theorems
• Secure quantum key distribution with an uncharacterized source
• Unambiguous state discrimination in quantum cryptography with weak coherent states
• Unconditionally Secure Key Distribution Based on Two Nonorthogonal States
• Unconditional security of coherent-state quantum key distribution with strong phase-reference pulse
• A de Finetti representation for finite symmetric quantum states
• Single-photon interference over 150-km transmission using silica-based integrated-optic interferometers for quantum cryptography
• A Generic Security Proof for Quantum Key Distribution
• A Proof of the Security of Quantum Key Distribution
• Unconditional security of the Bennett 1992 quantum key-distribution scheme with strong reference pulse
• Optimal Unambiguous State Discrimination of two density matrices and its link with the Fidelity
• Unconditional security in Quantum Cryptography
• Efficient quantum key distribution with practical sources and detectors
• Phase randomization improves the security of quantum key distribution
• Security of Quantum Key Distribution with Realistic Devices
• Universally composable privacy amplification against quantum adversaries
• Proof of unconditional security of six-state quantum key distribution scheme

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Quantum key distribution with entangled photon sources
• Security of decoy-state quantum key distribution with correlated intensity fluctuations
• Quantum cryptography: theory and practice
• A consolidated and accessible security proof for finite-size decoy-state quantum key distribution
• Communicating at a record 14.5 bits per received photon through a photon-starved channel