This elusive objective existence
arXiv:quant-ph/0401179 · doi:10.1142/S0219749904000183
Abstract
Zurek's existential interpretation of quantum mechanics suffers from three classical prejudices, including the belief that space and time are intrinsically and infinitely differentiated. They compel him to relativize the concept of objective existence in two ways. The elimination of these prejudices makes it possible to recognize the quantum formalism's ontological implications - the relative and contingent reality of spatiotemporal distinctions and the extrinsic and finite spatiotemporal differentiation of the physical world - which in turn makes it possible to arrive at an unqualified objective existence. Contrary to a widespread misconception, viewing the quantum formalism as being fundamentally a probability algorithm does not imply that quantum mechanics is concerned with states of knowledge rather than states of Nature. On the contrary, it makes possible a complete and strongly objective description of the physical world that requires no reference to observers. What objectively exists, in a sense that requires no qualification, is the trajectories of macroscopic objects, whose fuzziness is empirically irrelevant, the properties and values of whose possession these trajectories provide indelible records, and the fuzzy and temporally undifferentiated states of affairs that obtain between measurements and are described by counterfactual probability assignments.
To appear in IJQI; 21 pages, LaTeX
References in corpus (14)
- Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical
- Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics
- Decoherence, Einselection, and the Existential Interpretation (the Rough Guide)
- Do we really understand quantum mechanics?
- On a Time Symmetric Formulation of Quantum Mechanics
- Classical interventions in quantum systems. I. The measuring process
- The Pondicherry interpretation of quantum mechanics
- Probabilities from envariance?
- Objective probabilities, quantum counterfactuals, and the ABL rule
- Time-Symmetrized Quantum Theory
- Why the laws of physics are just so
- Do quantum states evolve? Apropos of Marchildon's remarks
- Is the end in sight for theoretical pseudophysics?
- Reflections on the Spatiotemporal Aspects of the Quantum World
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Probabilities from envariance?
- The Pondicherry interpretation of quantum mechanics: An overview
- Is the end in sight for theoretical pseudophysics?
- Quantum mechanics explained
- Objective probability and quantum fuzziness
- Defending the Pondicherry interpretation: A response to Shafiee, Jafar-Aghdami, and Golshani
- Comment on "Quantum Physics from A to Z"
- The Utility of Time-Symmetric Quantum Counterfactuals: A Response to Kastner