Quantum Cryptography: Security Criteria Reexamined
arXiv:quant-ph/0310144 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.70.032306
Abstract
We find that the generally accepted security criteria are flawed for a whole class of protocols for quantum cryptography. This is so because a standard assumption of the security analysis, namely that the so-called square-root measurement is optimal for eavesdropping purposes, is not true in general. There are rather large parameter regimes in which the optimal measurement extracts substantially more information than the square-root measurement.
4 pages, 4 figures. No substantial changes. Updated version as published in PRA
References in corpus (7)
- Security of quantum key distribution using d-level systems
- Quantum State Discrimination
- Quantum cloning and the capacity of the Pauli channel
- Asymmetric quantum cloning machines in any dimension
- Quantum Key Distribution using Multilevel Encoding: Security Analysis
- Tomographic Quantum Cryptography
- Tomographic Quantum Cryptography: Equivalence of Quantum and Classical Key Distillation
Cited by in corpus (9)
- On mutually unbiased bases
- Quantum cloning
- Min-entropy and quantum key distribution: non-zero key rates for "small" numbers of signals
- Eavesdropping without quantum memory
- Iterative procedure for computing accessible information in quantum communication
- Robustness of a quantum key distribution with two and three mutually unbiased bases
- How well can you know the edge of a quantum pyramid?
- Variational Quantum Cloning: Improving Practicality for Quantum Cryptanalysis
- Coherent Eavesdropping Attacks in Quantum Cryptography: Nonequivalence of Quantum and Classical Key Distillation