Reply to Marinatto's comment on "Bell's theorem without inequalities and without probabilities for two observers"
arXiv:quant-ph/0306180 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.258902
Abstract
It is shown that Marinatto's claim [Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 258901 (2003)] that the proof of "Bell's theorem without inequalities and without probabilities for two observers" [A. Cabello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1911 (2001)] requires four spacelike separated observers rather than two is unjustified.
REVTeX4, 1 page
References in corpus (4)
- Bell's theorem without inequalities and without probabilities for two observers
- All-Versus-Nothing Violation of Local Realism for Two Entangled Photons
- Rotationally invariant proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities
- Comment on "Bell's Theorem without Inequalities and without Probabilities for Two Observers"