Best conventional solutions to the King's Problem
arXiv:quant-ph/0306119 · doi:10.1515/zna-2003-1204
Abstract
In the King's Problem, a physicist is asked to prepare a d-state quantum system in any state of her choosing and give it to a king who measures one of (d+1) sets of mutually unbiased observables on it. The physicist is then allowed to make a control measurement on the system, following which the king reveals which set of observables he measured and challenges the physicist to predict correctly all the eigenvalues he found. This paper obtains an upper bound on the physicist's probability of success at this task if she is allowed to make measurements only on the system itself (the "conventional" solution) and not on the system as well as any ancillary systems it may have been coupled to in the preparation phase, as in the perfect solutions proposed recently. An optimal conventional solution, with a success probability of 0.7, is constructed in d = 4; this is to be contrasted with the success probability of 0.902 for the optimal conventional solution in d = 2. The gap between the best conventional solution and the perfect solution grows quite rapidly with increasing d.
17 pages, 5 tables. Parts of Sec.2 and the appendix have been rewritten to improve the clarity of the presentation
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Mutually unbiased bases and discrete Wigner functions
- Maximally Entangled States of Four Nonbinary Particles
- Solution to the mean king's problem using quantum error-correcting codes
- Bases for spin systems and qudits from angular momentum theory
- Solutions to the mean king's problem: higher-dimensional quantum error-correcting codes
- A New Relation between post and pre-optimal measurement states