The Bacterial Chemotactic Response Reflects a Compromise Between Transient and Steady State Behavior

Abstract

Swimming bacteria detect chemical gradients by performing temporal comparisons of recent measurements of chemical concentration. These comparisons are described quantitatively by the chemotactic response function, which we expect to optimize chemotactic behavioral performance. We identify two independent chemotactic performance criteria: in the short run, a favorable response function should move bacteria up chemoattractant gradients, while in the long run, bacteria should aggregate at peaks of chemoattractant concentration. Surprisingly, these two criteria conflict, so that when one performance criterion is most favorable, the other is unfavorable. Since both types of behavior are biologically relevant, we include both behaviors in a composite optimization that yields a response function that closely resembles experimental measurements. Our work suggests that the bacterial chemotactic response function can be derived from simple behavioral considerations, and sheds light on how the response function contributes to chemotactic performance.

19 pages, 5 figures

References in corpus (2)

• Perfect and near perfect adaptation in a model of bacterial chemotaxis
• Adaptation and Optimal Chemotactic Strategy for E. Coli

Cited by in corpus (32)

• Statistical Mechanics of Interacting Run-and-Tumble Bacteria
• Diffusive transport without detailed balance in motile bacteria: Does microbiology need statistical physics?
• Bacteria display optimal transport near surfaces -- bacteria as intermittent active chiral particles: trapped by hydrodynamics, escaping by adhesion
• E. coli chemotaxis is information-limited
• Migration of chemotactic bacteria in soft agar: role of gel concentration
• Limits of feedback control in bacterial chemotaxis
• Chemotactic response and adaptation dynamics in Escherichia coli
• Persistence of direction increases the drift velocity of run and tumble chemotaxis
• Microswimmers learning chemotaxis with genetic algorithms
• Pseudo-Chemotactic Drifts of Artificial Microswimmers
• Feedback Between Motion and Sensation Provides Nonlinear Boost in Run-and-tumble Navigation
• Dynamics of a microorganism moving by chemotaxis in its own secretion
• Osmotaxis in Escherichia coli through changes in motor speed
• Signalling noise enhances chemotactic drift of E. coli
• Predicting chemical environments of bacteria from receptor signaling
• Chemotaxis When Bacteria Remember: Drift versus Diffusion
• Stiff-response-induced instability for chemotactic bacteria and flux-limited Keller-Segel equation
• Optimal receptor-cluster size determined by intrinsic and extrinsic noise
• Markovian robots: minimal navigation strategies for active particles
• Quantitative characterization of run-and-tumble statistics in bulk bacterial suspensions
• Implications of 3-step swimming patterns in bacterial chemotaxis
• Optimal sensing and control of run-and-tumble chemotaxis
• A Monte Carlo simulation for kinetic chemotaxis models: an application to the traveling population wave
• Optimal search in E.coli chemotaxis
• On a Condition for Intracellular Adaptive Dynamics for Chemotaxis
• Light control of the diffusion coefficient of active fluids
• A path-integral formulation of the run and tumble motion and chemotaxis in Escherichia coli
• Run and tumble chemotaxis in a shear flow: the effect of temporal comparisons and other complications
• Frequency-dependent Chemolocation and Chemotactic Target Selection
• Chemotaxing E. coli do not count single molecules
• Run-and-Tumble Particles Learning Chemotaxis
• Analytical Approach for Calculating Chemotaxis Sensitivity Function