Inhibition of protein crystallization by evolutionary negative design

Abstract

In this perspective we address the question: why are proteins seemingly so hard to crystallize? We suggest that this is because of evolutionary negative design, i.e. proteins have evolved not to crystallize, because crystallization, as with any type of protein aggregation, compromises the viability of the cell. There is much evidence in the literature that supports this hypothesis, including the effect of mutations on the crystallizability of a protein, the correlations found in the properties of crystal contacts in bioinformatics databases, and the positive use of protein crystallization by bacteria and viruses.

5 pages

References in corpus (1)

• Solution stability, neutral evolution and variability in a simple model of globular proteins

Cited by in corpus (10)

• Controlling crystallization and its absence: Proteins, colloids and patchy models
• Soft Matter Perspective on Protein Crystal Assembly
• Learning to grow: control of material self-assembly using evolutionary reinforcement learning
• Characterizing protein crystal contacts and their role in crystallization: rubredoxin as a case study
• Evolutionary Dynamics in a Simple Model of Self-Assembly
• The self-assembly of DNA Holliday junctions studied with a minimal model
• The cytoplasm of living cells: A functional mixture of thousands of components
• Minimal positive design for self-assembly of the Archimedean tilings
• Neuroevolutionary learning of particles and protocols for self-assembly
• Specific protein-protein binding in many-component mixtures of proteins