Crystal Interpretation of Kerov-Kirillov-Reshetikhin Bijection II. Proof for sl_n Case
arXiv:math/0601697 · doi:10.1007/s10801-007-0075-2
Abstract
In proving the Fermionic formulae, combinatorial bijection called the Kerov--Kirillov--Reshetikhin (KKR) bijection plays the central role. It is a bijection between the set of highest paths and the set of rigged configurations. In this paper, we give a proof of crystal theoretic reformulation of the KKR bijection. It is the main claim of Part I (math.QA/0601630) written by A. Kuniba, M. Okado, T. Takagi, Y. Yamada, and the author. The proof is given by introducing a structure of affine combinatorial matrices on rigged configurations.
45 pages, version for publication. Introduction revised, more explanations added to the main text
References in corpus (6)
Cited by in corpus (14)
- Crystal interpretation of Kerov-Kirillov-Reshetikhin bijection
- Tau functions in combinatorial Bethe ansatz
- Singular Solutions to the Bethe Ansatz Equations and Rigged Configurations
- Affine crystal structure on rigged configurations of type D_n^(1)
- Kirillov--Schilling--Shimozono bijection as energy functions of crystals
- Relationships Between Two Approaches: Rigged Configurations and 10-Eliminations
- Box-Basket-Ball Systems
- Stable Rigged Configurations for Quantum Affine Algebras of Nonexceptional Types
- Ultradiscrete Soliton Systems and Combinatorial Representation Theory
- A uniform approach to soliton cellular automata using rigged configurations
- Finding Rigged Configurations From Paths
- Paths and Kostka--Macdonald Polynomials
- Promotion operator on rigged configurations of type A
- A crystal theoretic method for finding rigged configurations from paths