Renormalization of Higher Derivative Operators in the Matrix Model
arXiv:hep-th/9805007 · doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)01354-9
Abstract
-theory is believed to be described in various dimensions by large field theories. It has been further conjectured that at finite , these theories describe the discrete light cone quantization (DLCQ) of theory. Even at low energies, this is not necessarily the same thing as the DLCQ of supergravity. It is believed that this is only the case for quantities which are protected by non-renormalization theorems. In 0+1 and 1+1 dimensions, we provide further evidence of a non-renormalization theorem for the terms, but also give evidence that there are not such theorems at order and higher.
14 pages latex. Note added in light of recent developments
References in corpus (19)
- Why is the Matrix Model Correct?
- Another Conjecture about M(atrix) Theory
- Lectures on D-branes
- Higher Order Graviton Scattering in M(atrix) Theory
- Comments on Higher Derivative Operators in Some SUSY Field Theories
- Matrix Theory
- Lectures on D-branes, Gauge Theory and M(atrices)
- Constraints From Extended Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics
- A Two-Loop Test of M(atrix) Theory
- Compactification in the Lightlike Limit
- Supersymmetry and Higher Derivative Terms in the Effective Action of Yang-Mills Theories
- Why Matrix Theory is Hard
- Review of Matrix Theory
- Issues in M(atrix) Theory Compactification
- On Graviton Scattering Amplitudes in M-Theory
- M(atrix)-Theory in Various Dimensions
- Multigraviton Scattering in the Matrix Model
- Supergravity and matrix theory do not disagree on multi-graviton scattering
- About the Matrix model computation of three-graviton scattering