A First Comparison of SLOPE and Other LIGO Burst Event Trigger Generators
arXiv:gr-qc/0609110 · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/19/S12
Abstract
A number of different methods have been proposed to identify unanticipated burst sources of gravitational waves in data arising from LIGO and other gravitational wave detectors. When confronted with such a wide variety of methods one is moved to ask if they are all necessary, i.e. given detector data that is assumed to have no gravitational wave signals present, do they generally identify the same events with the same efficiency, or do they each 'see' different things in the detector? Here we consider three different methods, which have been used within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration as part of its search for unanticipated gravitational wave bursts. We find that each of these three different methods developed for identifying candidate gravitational wave burst sources are, in fact, attuned to significantly different features in detector data, suggesting that they may provide largely independent lists of candidate gravitational wave burst events.
arXiv comment10 Pages, 5 Figures, Presented at the 10th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop (GWDAW-10), 14-17 December 2005 at the University of Texas, Brownsville
References in corpus (8)
- An excess power statistic for detection of burst sources of gravitational radiation
- Multiresolution techniques for the detection of gravitational-wave bursts
- First upper limits from LIGO on gravitational wave bursts
- Time-frequency detection algorithm for gravitational wave bursts
- An efficient filter for detecting gravitational wave bursts in interferometric detectors
- Performance of the WaveBurst algorithm on LIGO data
- Overview of the BlockNormal Event Trigger Generator
- Comparison of filters for detecting gravitational wave bursts in interferometric detectors