Model-Dependence of Shapiro Time Delay and the "Speed of Gravity/Speed of Light" Controversy

Abstract

Fomalont and Kopeikin have recently succeeded in measuring the velocity-dependent component of the Shapiro time delay of light from a quasar passing behind Jupiter. While there is general agreement that this observation tests the gravitomagnetic properties of the gravitational field, a controversy has emerged over the question of whether the results depend on the speed of light, $c$, or the speed of gravity, $c_g$. By analyzing the Shapiro time delay in a set of ``preferred frame'' models, I demonstrate that this question is ill-posed: the distinction can only be made in the context of a class of theories in which $c\ne c_g$, and the answer then depends on the specific class of theories one chooses. It remains true, however, that for a large class of theories ``close enough'' to general relativity, the leading contribution to the time delay depends on $c$ and not $c_g$; within this class, observations are thus not yet accurate enough to measure the speed of gravity.

12 pages, LaTeX; v2: added discussion of present observational limits, and of relative importance of various contributions to time delay; new references; v3: minor clarifications in response to referee

References in corpus (7)

• The Measurement of the Light Deflection from Jupiter: Experimental Results
• Propagation Speed of Gravity and the Relativistic Time Delay
• Constraints Algebra and Equations of Motion in Bohmian Interpretation of Quantum Gravity
• The Speed of Gravity in General Relativity and Theoretical Interpretation of the Jovian Deflection Experiment
• The Light-cone Effect on the Shapiro Time Delay
• The Post-Newtonian Treatment of the VLBI Experiment on September 8, 2002
• Aberration by gravitational lenses in motion

Cited by in corpus (25)

• The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
• The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
• Photon and Graviton Mass Limits
• Editorial for the Special Issue 100 Years of Chronogeometrodynamics: The Status of the Einstein's Theory of Gravitation in Its Centennial Year
• Gravitational bending of light by planetary multipoles and its measurement with microarcsecond astronomical interferometers
• Micro-arcsecond light bending by Jupiter
• Gravimagnetism, Causality, and Aberration of Gravity in the Gravitational Light-Ray Deflection Experiments
• The emergence of a universal limiting speed
• Aberration and the Fundamental Speed of Gravity in the Jovian Deflection Experiment
• Gravity Gets There First with Dark Matter Emulators
• Gravitomagnetism and the Speed of Gravity
• From Clock Synchronization to Dark Matter as a Relativistic Inertial Effect
• High Resolution Radio Astronomy Using Very Long Baseline Interferometry
• The Galactic One-Way Shapiro Delay to PSR B1937+21
• Comment on 'Model-dependence of Shapiro time delay and the "speed of gravity/speed of light" controversy'
• Light propagation in 2PN approximation in the field of one moving monopole II. Boundary value problem
• A Rømer time-delay determination of the gravitational-wave propagation speed
• Lorentz violation and the speed of gravitational waves in brane-worlds
• Comments on the paper by S. Samuel "On the speed of gravity and the Jupiter/Quasar measurement"
• On the Speed of Gravity and Relativistic v/c Corrections to the Shapiro Time Delay
• Measurement of the Speed of Gravity
• Radio Tests of GR
• Covariant Equations of Motion Beyond the Spin-Dipole Particle Approximation
• Speed Limit on the brane
• Reply to ``Comment on Model-dependence of Shapiro time delay and the `speed of gravity/speed of light' controversy''