Uncertainty in Measurements of Distance
arXiv:gr-qc/0201030 · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/14/101
Abstract
Ng and van Dam have argued that quantum theory and general relativity give a lower bound of L^{1/3} L_P^{2/3} on the uncertainty of any distance, where L is the distance to be measured and L_P is the Planck length. Their idea is roughly that to minimize the position uncertainty of a freely falling measuring device one must increase its mass, but if its mass becomes too large it will collapse to form a black hole. Here we show that one can go below the Ng-van Dam bound by attaching the measuring device to a massive elastic rod. Relativistic limitations on the rod's rigidity, together with the constraint that its length exceeds its Schwarzschild radius, imply that zero-point fluctuations of the rod give an uncertainty greater than or equal to L_P.
5 pages LaTeX
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (13)
- Modern tests of Lorentz invariance
- Minimum Length from Quantum Mechanics and Classical General Relativity
- Fundamental decoherence from quantum gravity: a pedagogical review
- Relational physics with real rods and clocks and the measurement problem of quantum mechanics
- Length Uncertainty in a Gravity's Rainbow Formalism
- Deformed Density Matrix and Quantum Entropy of the Black Hole
- Assessing the Montevideo Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
- Comment on "Uncertainty in measurements of distance"
- Time Uncertainty in Quantum Gravitational Systems
- A single-world consistent interpretation of quantum mechanics from fundamental time and length uncertainties
- Information, information processing and gravity
- Fundamental Limit on Angular Measurements and Rotations from Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity
- Salecker-Wigner-Karolyhazy Gedankenexperiment in light of the self-gravity