Assessing the Montevideo Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
arXiv:1406.4351 · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.04.001
Abstract
This paper gives a philosophical assessment of the Montevideo interpretation of quantum theory, advocated by Gambini, Pullin and co-authors. This interpretation has the merit of linking its proposal about how to solve the measurement problem to the search for quantum gravity: namely by suggesting that quantum gravity makes for fundamental limitations on the accuracy of clocks, which imply a type of decoherence that "collapses the wave-packet". I begin (Section 2) by sketching the topics of decoherence, and quantum clocks, on which the interpretation depends. Then I expound the interpretation, from a philosopher's perspective (Sections 3, 4 and 5). Finally, in Section 6, I argue that the interpretation, at least as developed so far, is best seen as a form of the Everett interpretation: namely with an effective or approximate branching, that is induced by environmental decoherence of the familiar kind, and by the Montevideans' "temporal decoherence".
28 pages, no figures, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (online) May 2014
References in corpus (8)
- Conditional probabilities with Dirac observables and the problem of time in quantum gravity
- Fundamental decoherence from quantum gravity: a pedagogical review
- Relational physics with real rods and clocks and the measurement problem of quantum mechanics
- Fundamental spatiotemporal decoherence: a key to solving the conceptual problems of black holes, cosmology and quantum mechanics
- Loss of entanglement in quantum mechanics due to the use of realistic measuring rods
- Are there fundamental limits for observing quantum phenomena from within quantum theory?
- Free will, undecidability, and the problem of time in quantum gravity
- Undecidability as solution to the problem of measurement: fundamental criterion for the production of events