Bell inequalities for random fields
arXiv:cond-mat/0403692 · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/23/018
Abstract
The assumptions required for the derivation of Bell inequalities are not usually satisfied for random fields in which there are any thermal or quantum fluctuations, in contrast to the general satisfaction of the assumptions for classical two point particle models. Classical random field models that explicitly include the effects of quantum fluctuations on measurement are possible for experiments that violate Bell inequalities.
18 pages; 1 figure; v4: Essentially the published version; extensive improvements. v3: Better description of the relationship between classical random fields and quantum fields; better description of random field models. More extensive references. v2: Abstract and introduction clarified
References in corpus (5)
- Quantum Gravity as a Dissipative Deterministic System
- There are No Causality Problems for Fermi's Two Atom System
- Assumptions Underlying Bell's Inequalities
- A succinct presentation of the quantized Klein-Gordon field, and a similar quantum presentation of the classical Klein-Gordon random field
- A relativistic variant of the Wigner function
Cited by in corpus (13)
- An Algebraic Approach to Koopman Classical Mechanics
- Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments: a discrete data driven approach
- Discrete-event simulation of an extended Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment
- Orbit quantization in a retarded harmonic oscillator
- Equivalence of the Klein-Gordon random field and the complex Klein-Gordon quantum field
- Can foreign exchange rates violate Bell inequalities?
- Lie fields revisited
- Classical states, quantum field measurement
- Contextuality and correlation loopholes are equivalent
- The photon identification loophole in EPRB experiments: computer models with single-wing selection
- Comment on "A glance beyond the quantum model" [arXiv:0907.0372]
- Embedding quantum and random optics in a larger field theory
- The direction of time in quantum field theory