Superconductivity from Undressing
arXiv:cond-mat/0007115 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.62.14487
Abstract
Photoemission experiments in high cuprates indicate that quasiparticles are heavily 'dressed' in the normal state, particularly in the low doping regime. Furthermore these experiments show that a gradual undressing occurs both in the normal state as the system is doped and the carrier concentration increases, as well as at fixed carrier concentration as the temperature is lowered and the system becomes superconducting. A similar picture can be inferred from optical experiments. It is argued that these experiments can be simply understood with the single assumption that the quasiparticle dressing is a function of the local carrier concentration. Microscopic Hamiltonians describing this physics are discussed. The undressing process manifests itself in both the one-particle and two-particle Green's functions, hence leads to observable consequences in photoemission and optical experiments respectively. An essential consequence of this phenomenology is that the microscopic Hamiltonians describing it break electron-hole symmetry: these Hamiltonians predict that superconductivity will only occur for carriers with hole-like character, as proposed in the theory of hole superconductivity.
References in corpus (5)
- Stripe phases in high-temperature superconductors
- STM Studies of the Electronic Structure of Vortex Cores in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+d
- Interlayer Conductivity in the Superconductor Tl-Ba-Cu-O: Energetics and Energy Scales
- Where is 99% of the condensation energy of Tl_2Ba_2CuO_y coming from?
- Pairing Correlations in a Generalized Hubbard Model for the Cuprates
Cited by in corpus (29)
- Hole Superconductivity in : a high cuprate without Cu
- Pairing in cuprates from high energy electronic states
- Electrodynamics of superconductors
- Charge expulsion and electric field in superconductors
- Electron-Phonon or Hole Superconductivity in ?
- Consequences of charge imbalance in superconductors within the theory of hole superconductivity
- Electron-hole asymmetry and superconductivity
- Superconductors as giant atoms predicted by the theory of hole superconductivity
- Kinetic energy driven superconductivity and pseugogap phase in weakly doped antiferromagnets
- Why holes are not like electrons. II. The role of the electron-ion interaction
- The London moment: what a rotating superconductor reveals about superconductivity
- The fundamental role of charge asymmetry in superconductivity
- Hole superconductivity in Arsenic-Iron compounds
- Superconductivity from Undressing. II. Single Particle Green's Function and Photoemission in Cuprates
- Kinetic energy driven superconductivity, the origin of the Meissner effect, and the reductionist frontier
- Predicted electric field near small superconducting ellipsoids
- Charge expulsion, Spin Meissner effect, and charge inhomogeneity in superconductors
- Charge expulsion, charge inhomogeneity and phase separation in dynamic Hubbard models
- Why holes are not like electrons. III. How holes in the normal state turn into electrons in the superconducting state
- Dynamic Hubbard model: kinetic energy driven charge expulsion, charge inhomogeneity, hole superconductivity, and Meissner effect
- Effect of orbital relaxation on the band structure of cuprate superconductors and implications for the superconductivity mechanism
- Two-site dynamical mean field theory for the dynamic Hubbard model
- Superconductivity from Hole Undressing
- Optical conductivity for a dimer in the Dynamic Hubbard model
- Pair production and ionizing radiation from superconductors
- Dynamic Hubbard model for solids with hydrogen-like atoms
- Why holes are not like electrons. IV. Hole undressing and spin current in the superconducting state
- Condensation energy in Eliashberg theory -- from weak to strong coupling
- On the Nature of the `Quasiparticle' Peak in the Angular Resolved Spectrum of the Superconducting Underdoped BiSrCaCuO