paper

The APM cluster-galaxy cross-correlation function : Constraints on Omega and galaxy bias

arXiv:astro-ph/9801254 · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02381.x

Abstract

(abridged) We estimate the cluster-galaxy cross-correlation function (Xi_cg), from the APM galaxy and galaxy cluster surveys, both in real space from the inversion of projected statistics and in redshift space using the galaxy and cluster redshift samples. The amplitude of Xi_cg is found to be almost independent of cluster richness. At large separations, r >~5 h^-1 Mpc, Xi_cg has a similar shape to the galaxy-galaxy and cluster-cluster autocorrelation functions. Xi_cg in redshift space can be related to the real space Xi_cg by convolution with an appropriate velocity field model. Here we apply a spherical collapse model, which we have tested against N-body simulations, finding that it provides a surprisingly accurate description of the averaged infall velocity of matter into galaxy clusters. We use this model to estimate beta (Omega^{0.6}/b) and find that it tends to overestimate the true result in simulations by only ~10-30%. Application to the APM results yields beta=0.43 with beta < 0.87 at 95% confidence. We also compare the APM Xi_cg and galaxy autocorrelations to results from popular cosmological models and derive two independent estimates of the galaxy biasing expected as a function of scale. Both low and critical density CDM models require anti-biasing by a factor ~2 on scales r <~ 2 h^-1Mpc and an MDM model is consistent with a constant biasing factor on all scales. We use the velocity fields predicted from the different models to distort the APM real space cross-correlation function. Comparison with the APM redshift space Xi_cg yields an estimate of the value of Omega^0.6 needed in each model. Only the low Omega model is fully consistent with observations, with MDM marginally excluded at the ~2 sigma level.

Latex (mn.sty), 17 pages, 16 ps figs, submitted to MNRAS

References in corpus (8)

Cited by in corpus (42)