Natural Phantom Dark Energy, Wiggling Hubble Parameter $H(z)$ and Direct $H(z)$ Data

Abstract

Recent direct $H(z)$ data indicate that the parameter $H(z)$ may wiggle with respect to $z$. On the other hand the luminosity distance data of supernovae flatten the wiggles of $H(z)$ because of integration effect. It is expected that the fitting results can be very different in a model permitting a wiggling $H(z)$ because the data of supernovae is highly degenerated to such a model. As an example the natural phantom dark energy is investigated in this paper. The dynamical property of this model is studied. The model is fitted by the direct $H(z)$ data set and the SNLS data set, respectively. And the results are quite different, as expected. The quantum stability of this model is also shortly discussed. We find it is a viable model if we treat it as an effective theory truncated by an upperbound.

14 pages, 2 figures, discussions on the stability added, conclusions not changed

References in corpus (3)

• Cosmological Evolution of a Quintom Model of Dark Energy
• Interacting Phantom Energy
• Critical comments on the paper "Crossing $\omega =-1$ by a single scalar field on a Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati brane" by H Zhang and Z-H Zhu [Phys.Rev.D75,023510(2007)]

Cited by in corpus (7)

• Reconstructing the universe history, from inflation to acceleration, with phantom and canonical scalar fields
• Entropy-Corrected Holographic Dark Energy
• Delicate f(R) gravity models with disappearing cosmological constant and observational constraints on the model parameters
• Galaxy Cluster Gas Mass Fraction and Hubble Parameter versus Redshift Constraints on Dark Energy
• Fitting oscillating string gas cosmology to supernova data
• Probing the nature of cosmic acceleration
• A quantitative criteria for the coincidence problem