Why anthropic reasoning cannot predict Lambda
arXiv:astro-ph/0607227 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.201301
Abstract
We revisit anthropic arguments purporting to explain the measured value of the cosmological constant. We argue that different ways of assigning probabilities to candidate universes lead to totally different anthropic predictions. As an explicit example, we show that weighting different universes by the total number of possible observations leads to an extremely small probability for observing a value of Lambda equal to or greater than what we now measure. We conclude that anthropic reasoning within the framework of probability as frequency is ill-defined and that in the absence of a fundamental motivation for selecting one weighting scheme over another the anthropic principle cannot be used to explain the value of Lambda, nor, likely, any other physical parameters.
4 pages, 1 figure. Discussion slighlty expanded, refs added, conclusions unchanged. Matches published version
References in corpus (6)
- Dimensionless constants, cosmology and other dark matters
- Likely Values of the Cosmological Constant
- Why is the CMB fluctuation level 10^{-5}?
- On likely values of the cosmological constant
- Life, The Universe, and Nothing: Life and Death in an Ever-Expanding Universe
- The Cold Big-Bang Cosmology as a Counter-example to Several Anthropic Arguments
Cited by in corpus (21)
- Everything You Always Wanted To Know About The Cosmological Constant Problem (But Were Afraid To Ask)
- Varying constants, Gravitation and Cosmology
- Inflationary Cosmology
- Sinks in the Landscape, Boltzmann Brains, and the Cosmological Constant Problem
- Life at the Interface of Particle Physics and String Theory
- Prediction and explanation in the multiverse
- Technically natural dark energy from Lorentz breaking
- Testing anthropic predictions for Lambda and the CMB temperature
- Cosmological Constant Problems and Renormalization Group
- Reconstructing the history of dark energy using maximum entropy
- Observational Constraints on Dynamical Dark Energy Models
- Anthropic versus cosmological solutions to the coincidence problem
- Editorial note to "Large number coincidences and the anthropic principle in cosmology"
- Tainted Evidence: Cosmological Model Selection vs. Fitting
- Anthropics and Myopics: Conditional Probabilities and the Cosmological Constant
- Limitations of anthropic predictions for the cosmological constant : Cosmic Heat Death of Anthropic Observers
- Quantizing the Eisenhart Lift
- Bayesian Reasoning in Eternal Inflation: A Solution to the Measure Problem
- Resolving the observer reference class problem in cosmology
- The Virtues of Frugality - Why cosmological observers should release their data slowly
- Background dynamics and observational constraints of flat and non-flat CDM models from and DESI DR2 BAO measurements