The Cold Big-Bang Cosmology as a Counter-example to Several Anthropic Arguments

Abstract

A general Friedmann big-bang cosmology can be specified by fixing a half-dozen cosmological parameters such as the photon-to-baryon ratio Eta, the cosmological constant Lambda, the curvature scale R, and the amplitude Q of (assumed scale-invariant) primordial density fluctuations. There is currently no established theory as to why these parameters take the particular values we deduce from observations. This has led to proposed `anthropic' explanations for the observed value of each parameter, as the only value capable of generating a universe that can host intelligent life. In this paper, I explicitly show that the requirement that the universe generates sun-like stars with planets does not fix these parameters, by developing a class of cosmologies (based on the classical `cold big-bang' model) in which some or all of the cosmological parameters differ by orders of magnitude from the values they assume in the standard hot big-bang cosmology, without precluding in any obvious way the existence of intelligent life. I also give a careful discussion of the structure and context of anthropic arguments in cosmology, and point out some implications of the cold big-bang model's existence for anthropic arguments concerning specific parameters.

13 PRD-style pages, 2 postscript figures. Reference 26 corrected. Accepted to Phys. Rev. D

References in corpus (1)

• A prescription for probabilities in eternal inflation

Cited by in corpus (35)

• What does inflation really predict?
• Categorizing Different Approaches to the Cosmological Constant Problem
• Is There A String Theory Landscape
• Anthropic Principle Favors the Holographic Dark Energy
• Low Energy Supersymmetry From the Landscape
• Moduli potentials in string compactifications with fluxes: mapping the Discretuum
• Life at the Interface of Particle Physics and String Theory
• A Universe Without Weak Interactions
• Is Our Universe Natural?
• Multiverses and physical cosmology
• Testable anthropic predictions for dark energy
• Density Perturbations and the Cosmological Constant from Inflationary Landscapes
• The Beginning and the End: The Meaning of Life in a Cosmological Perspective
• Multiple universes, cosmic coincidences, and other dark matters
• The Degree of Fine-Tuning in our Universe -- and Others
• Anthropic Reasons for Non-Zero Flatness and Lambda
• Anthropic Distribution for Cosmological Constant and Primordial Density Perturbations
• Anthropic predictions for neutrino masses
• Nuclear Astrophysics of Worlds in the String Landscape
• Why anthropic reasoning cannot predict Lambda
• The scale of gravity and the cosmological constant within a landscape
• The Cosmological Constant Problem, an Inspiration for New Physics
• The Future of Scientific Simulations: from Artificial Life to Artificial Cosmogenesis
• Computational and Biological Analogies for Understanding Fine-Tuned Parameters in Physics
• Limitations of anthropic predictions for the cosmological constant $\Lambda$: Cosmic Heat Death of Anthropic Observers
• Testing anthropic reasoning for the cosmological constant with a realistic galaxy formation model
• The Bayesian Who Knew Too Much
• Initial Conditions of Inhomogeneous Universe and the Cosmological Constant Problem
• Scale invariant gravity and the quasi-static universe
• Congeniality Bounds on Quark Masses from Nucleosynthesis
• "All that matter ... in one Big Bang ...," & other cosmological singularities
• The Fine-Tuning Argument
• Under an Iron Sky: On the Entropy at the Start of the Universe
• Precision Cosmology and the Landscape
• Review of Geraint F. Lewis and Luke A. Barnes, A Fortunate Universe: Life in a Finely Tuned Cosmos