X-ray Galaxy Clusters in NoSOCS: Substructure and the Correlation of Optical and X-ray Properties
arXiv:astro-ph/0605292 · doi:10.1086/505630
Abstract
We present a comparison of optical and X-ray properties of galaxy clusters in the northern sky. We determine the recovery rate of X-ray detected clusters in the optical as a function of richness, redshift and X-ray luminosity, showing that the missed clusters are typically low contrast systems when observed optically. We employ four different statistical tests to test for the presence of substructure using optical two-dimensional data, finding that approximately 35% of the clusters show strong signs of substructure. However, the results are test-dependent, with variations also due to the magnitude range and radius utilized.We have also performed a comparison of X-ray luminosity and temperature with optical galaxy counts (richness). We find that the slope and scatter of the relations between richness and the X-ray properties are heavily dependent on the density contrast of the clusters. The selection of substructure-free systems does not improve the correlation between X-ray luminosity and richness, but this comparison also shows much larger scatter than one obtained using the X-ray temperature. In the latter case, the sample is significantly reduced because temperature measurements are available only for the most massive (and thus high contrast) systems. However, the comparison between temperature and richness is very sensitive to the exclusion of clusters showing signs of substructure. The correlation of X-ray luminosity and richness is based on the largest sample to date ( 750 clusters), while tests involving temperature use a similar number of objects as previous works ($\lsim$100). The results presented here are in good agreement with existing literature.
arXiv comment32 pages, 18 figures, ApJ in press, including minor changes following the ApJ's edition
References in corpus (28)
- Tracing cosmic evolution with clusters of galaxies
- Linear Regression for Astronomical Data with Measurement Errors and Intrinsic Scatter
- The Lx-T Relation and Temperature Function for Nearby Clusters Revisited
- Constraining Omega with Cluster Evolution
- COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS FROM CLUSTER X-RAY MORPHOLOGIES
- Measuring Omega_0 using cluster evolution
- Constraints on the fluctuation amplitude and density parameter from X-ray cluster number counts
- The Cluster Mass Function from Early SDSS Data: Cosmological Implications
- Effects of Mergers and Core Structure on the Bulk Properties of Nearby Galaxy Clusters
- The RASS-SDSS Galaxy Cluster Survey. III. Scaling relations of galaxy clusters
- A Very Hot, High Redshift Cluster of Galaxies: More Trouble for Omega_0 = 1
- Redshift Evolution of Galaxy Cluster Densities
- The Color-Magnitude Effect in Early-Type Cluster Galaxies
- The Northern Sky Optical Cluster Survey II: An Objective Cluster Catalog for 5800 Square Degrees
- ROSAT-SDSS Galaxy Clusters Survey. I. The Catalog and the correlation of X-ray and optical properties
- The Effects of Clumping and Substructure on ICM Mass Measurements
- Correlations of Richness and Global Properties in Galaxy Clusters
- Luminosity function of clusters of galaxies
- A Deficit of High-Redshift, High-Luminosity X-Ray Clusters: Evidence for a High Value of Omega_m?
- Searching for cluster substructure using APM and ROSAT data
- Distant Cluster Hunting II: A comparison of X-ray and optical cluster detection techniques and catalogs from the ROX Survey
- Exploring the Selection of Galaxy Clusters and Groups: An Optical Survey for X-ray Dark Clusters
- The First Detailed X-ray Observations of High-Redshift, Optically-Selected Clusters: XMM-Newton Results for Cl 1324+3011 at z = 0.76 and Cl 1604+4304 at z = 0.90
- Distant Cluster Hunting I: A Comparison Between the Optical and X-ray Luminosity Functions from an Optical/X-ray Survey
- The KPNO/Deeprange Distant Cluster Survey: I. The Catalog & the Space Density of Intermediate Redshift Clusters
- Constraints on Ω_0 and Cluster Evolution Using the ROSAT LogN-LogS
- The XMM/2dF survey III: Comparison between optical and X-ray cluster detection methods
- XMM-{\em Newton} Observations of Optically Selected SDSS Clusters
Cited by in corpus (28)
- redMaPPer I: Algorithm and SDSS DR8 Catalog
- Robust Optical Richness Estimation with Reduced Scatter
- An Optical Catalog of Galaxy Clusters Obtained from an Adaptive Matched Filter Finder Applied to SDSS DR6
- The Observations of Redshift Evolution in Large Scale Environments (ORELSE) Survey : I. The Survey Design and First Results on Cl 0023+0423 at z = 0.84 and RX J1821.6+6827 at z = 0.82
- Substructures in WINGS clusters
- Optical Substructure and BCG Offsets of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and X-ray Selected Galaxy Clusters
- SPIDER - III. Environmental Dependence of the Fundamental Plane of Early-type Galaxies
- NoSOCS in SDSS. I. Sample Definition and Comparison of Mass Estimates
- Dynamical state for 964 galaxy clusters from Chandra X-ray images
- NoSOCS in SDSS. VI. The Environmental Dependence of AGN in Clusters and Field in the Local Universe
- The Northern Sky Optical Cluster Survey III: A Cluster Catalog Covering Pi Steradians
- The X-ray Properties of Optically-Selected Galaxy Clusters
- Empirical Photometric Redshifts of Luminous Red Galaxies and Clusters in SDSS
- Dynamical state of galaxy clusters evaluated from X-ray images
- Galaxy Cluster Mass Reconstruction Project: III. The impact of dynamical substructure on cluster mass estimates
- NoSOCS in SDSS. II. Mass Calibration of Low Redshift Galaxy Clusters with Optical and X-ray Properties
- Structure and substructure analysis of DAFT/FADA galaxy clusters in the [0.4-0.9] redshift range
- NoSOCS in SDSS III - The interplay between galaxy evolution and the dynamical state of galaxy clusters
- The Role of Groups in Galaxy Evolution: compelling evidence of pre-processing out to the turnaround radius of clusters
- The Luminosity Function of the NoSOCS Galaxy Cluster Sample
- NoSOCS in SDSS. V. Red Disc and Blue Bulge Galaxies Across Different Environments
- NoSOCS in SDSS. IV. The Role of Environment Beyond the Extent of Galaxy Clusters
- DS+: a method for the identification of cluster substructures
- The X-ray-Optical Relations for Nine Clusters at z = 0.7-1.1
- Examining transitional galaxies to understand the role of clusters and their dynamical status in galaxy quenching
- Reliable Photometric Membership (RPM) of Galaxies in Clusters. I. A Machine Learning Method and its Performance in the Local Universe
- Evidence for line-of-sight structure in a comparison of X-ray and optical observations of the high-redshift cluster RCS043938-2904.7
- The Swift AGN and Cluster Survey. II. Cluster Confirmation with SDSS Data