The X-Ray Luminosity--Mass Relation for Local Clusters of Galaxies
arXiv:astro-ph/0602324 · doi:10.1086/506248
Abstract
We investigate the relationship between soft \xray luminosity and mass for low redshift clusters of galaxies by comparing observed number counts to expectations of CDM cosmologies. We use a three-parameter model for the conditional probability of luminosity given mass and epoch, described as a log-normal distribution of fixed width centered on a power-law scaling relation, $L \spropto M^p\rhoc^s(z)$. We use an ensemble of simulated clusters to argue that the observed, intrinsic variance in the temperature--luminosity relation is directly indicative of mass--luminosity variance, and derive $\sigm \se 0.43 \pm 0.06$ from HIFLUGCS data. Adding this to the likelihood analysis results in best-fit estimates $p \se 1.59 \pm 0.05$, $\lnlf \se 1.34 \pm 0.09$, and $\sigm \se 0.37 \pm 0.05$ for self-similar redshift evolution in a concordance ($Ω_m \se 0.3$, $Ω_Λ\se 0.7$, $σ_8 \se0.9$) universe. We show that the present-epoch intercept is very sensitive to power spectrum normalization, $\lnlf \spropto \sigate^{-4}$, and the slope is weakly sensitive to the matter density, $p \spropto Ω_m^{1/2}$. The intercept derived here is dimmer by a factor 2, and slope slightly steeper, than the L-M relation published using hydrostatic mass estimates of the HIFLUGCS sample. We show that this discrepancy is largely due to Malmquist bias of the \xray\ flux-limited sample. In light of new WMAP constraints, we discuss the interplay between parameters and sources of systematic error, and offer a compromise model with $Ω_m \se 0.24$, $σ_8 \se 0.85$, and somewhat lower scatter $\sigm \se 0.25$, in which hydrostatic mass estimates remain accurate to $\ssim 15%$. We stress the need for independent calibration of the L-M relation via weak gravitational lensing.
18 pages, 13 figures, accepted to ApJ. We have incorporated the WMAP cosmology constraints in our analysis
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (25)
- Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe
- Virial Scaling of Massive Dark Matter Halos: Why Clusters Prefer a High Normalization Cosmology
- The XMM-Newton wide-field survey in the COSMOS field: VI. Statistical properties of clusters of galaxies
- Statistics of X-ray observables for the cooling-core and non-cooling core galaxy clusters
- The Representative XMM-Newton Cluster Structure Survey (REXCESS) of an X-ray Luminosity Selected Galaxy Cluster Sample
- LoCuSS: Comparison of Observed X-ray and Lensing Galaxy Cluster Scaling Relations with Simulations
- The Lx-Yx Relation: Using Galaxy Cluster X-Ray Luminosity as a Robust, Low Scatter Mass Proxy
- The X-Ray Concentration-Virial Mass Relation
- Constraining the Scatter in the Mass-Richness Relation of maxBCG Clusters With Weak Lensing and X-ray Data
- The Cluster Mass Function from Weak Gravitational Lensing
- The L_X--M relation of Clusters of Galaxies
- Scaling relations and mass calibration of the X-ray luminous galaxy clusters at z~0.2: XMM-Newton observations
- The Effect of Gas Physics on the Halo Mass Function
- The Virial Mass Function of Nearby SDSS Galaxy Clusters
- LoCuSS: A Comparison of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect and Gravitational Lensing Measurements of Galaxy Clusters
- XMM-Newton study of 0.012<z<0.024 groups. I: Overview of the IGM thermodynamics
- Chandra X-ray Observations of the 0.6 < z < 1.1 Red-Sequence Cluster Survey Sample
- Calibration of the Mass-Temperature Relation for Clusters of Galaxies Using Weak Gravitational Lensing
- Red Sequence Cluster Finding in the Millennium Simulation
- Effects of Selection and Covariance on X-ray Scaling Relations of Galaxy Clusters
- Astrophysics in 2006
- Selection effects on X-ray and strong-lensing clusters in various cosmologies
- An Evolving Entropy Floor in the Intracluster Gas?
- The star pile in Abell 545
- Sensitivity and Insensitivity of Galaxy Cluster Surveys to New Physics