Do star formation rates of galaxy clusters depend on mass?: blue/late-type fractions, total star formation rates of 115 galaxy clusters as a function of cluster virial mass
arXiv:astro-ph/0411517 · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.08566.x
Abstract
There has been plenty of observational evidence of cluster galaxy evolution such as the Butcher-Oemler effect and the decrease in S0 fraction with increasing redshift. As a modern version, the redshift evolution of total star formation rate (SFR) in clusters has been actively debated recently. However, these studies of redshift trend have been always hampered by the possible mass dependence; due to the observational selection effects, clusters found at higher redshift inevitably tend to be more massive and luminous than local counterparts. Consequently, one has to correct for the mass trend before interpreting the redshift trend. As an attempt to break this degeneracy, we investigate the mass dependence of blue/late-type fractions and total SFR of 115 clusters at selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We find that none of blue/late-type fractions, total SFR and total SFR normalized by cluster mass shows significant dependence on cluster virial mass. The scatter is much larger at each cluster mass than a possible trend. Our results indicates that physical mechanisms that depend on cluster mass (such as the ram-pressure stripping) are not likely to be solely responsible for cluster galaxy evolution. Our results also provide an excellent low redshift comparison sample for future high redshift cluster SFR studies.
MNRAS Letters in press
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (30)
- Properties of Galaxy Groups in the SDSS: I.-- The Dependence of Colour, Star Formation, and Morphology on Halo Mass
- The evolution of the star formation activity in galaxies and its dependence on environment
- Star formation and AGN activity in SDSS cluster galaxies
- Protoclusters associated with z > 2 radio galaxies. I. Characteristics of high redshift protoclusters
- 266 E+A Galaxies Selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 2: The Origin of E+A Galaxies
- The DEEP2 galaxy redshift survey: the evolution of the blue fraction in groups and the field
- Velocity Dispersion of 335 Galaxy Clusters Selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Statistical Evidence for Dynamical Interaction, and Against Ram-Pressure Stripping
- The Butcher--Oemler effect at z~0.35: a change in perspective
- Optical Properties of 4248 IRAS Galaxies
- The red-sequence of 72 WINGS local galaxy clusters
- Galaxy mass, cluster-centric distance and secular evolution: their role in the evolution of galaxies in clusters in the last 10 Gyr
- Clusters and groups of galaxies in the 2dF galaxy redshift survey
- A WISE View of Star Formation in Local Galaxy Clusters
- The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey: the group catalogue
- Mass and Redshift Dependence of Star Formation in Relaxed Galaxy Clusters
- RASS-SDSS Galaxy Cluster Survey. VI. The dependence of the cluster SFR on the cluster global properties
- Abundance diagnosis of E+A (post-starburst) galaxies
- Star Formation and Substructure in Galaxy Clusters
- Galaxy evolution in the mid-infrared green valley: a case of the A2199 supercluster
- On the relationship between environment and galaxy properties in clusters of galaxies
- The Fundamental Planes of E+A galaxies and GALEX UV-excess early-type galaxies: Revealing their intimate connection
- Star formation and environment in clusters up to z~2.2
- Galaxy Clusters in the IRAC Dark Field II: Mid-IR Sources
- Star Formation and Supercluster Environment of 107 Nearby Galaxy Clusters
- Galaxy Clusters at 0.9<z<1.7 in the AKARI NEP deep field
- Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam revisits the large-scale environmental dependence on galaxy morphology over 360 deg at z=0.3-0.6
- Gamma Rays from Star Formation in Clusters of Galaxies
- Do cluster properties affect the quenching rate?
- Star formation rates and chemical abundances of emission line galaxies in intermediate-redshift clusters
- The MeerKAT Galaxy Clusters Legacy Survey: star formation in massive clusters at 0.15 < z < 0.35