Model-independent dark energy test with sigma_8 using results from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe
arXiv:astro-ph/0307346 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.041301
Abstract
By combining the recent WMAP measurements of the cosmic microwave background anisotropies and the results of the recent luminosity distance measurements to type-Ia supernovae, we find that the normalization of the matter power spectrum on cluster scales, sigma_8, can be used to discriminate between dynamical models of dark energy (quintessence models) and a conventional cosmological constant model (LCDM).
5 pages, 6 figures. Additional discussion and reference, matches PRD accepted version
References in corpus (13)
- First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters
- First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Preliminary Maps and Basic Results
- Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry
- Cosmological Results from High-z Supernovae
- First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Parameter Estimation Methodology
- Constraints on the equation of state of dark energy and the Hubble constant from stellar ages and the CMB
- Cosmic Microwave Background and Supernova Constraints on Quintessence: Concordance Regions and Target Models
- Tracking and coupled dark energy as seen by WMAP
- Precision Cosmology? Not Just Yet
- A preference for a non-zero neutrino mass from cosmological data
- An estimate of Ω_m without priors
- Condensate cosmology -- dark energy from dark matter
- Dark Energy and the Hubble Age
Cited by in corpus (30)
- Dynamics of dark energy
- Constraints on the redshift dependence of the dark energy potential
- Dark Matter and Dark Energy Interactions: Theoretical Challenges, Cosmological Implications and Observational Signatures
- Is there Supernova Evidence for Dark Energy Metamorphosis ?
- Planck 2015 results. XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity
- Super-acceleration as Signature of Dark Sector Interaction
- Observational constraints on low redshift evolution of dark energy: How consistent are different observations?
- Perturbations of the Quintom Models of Dark Energy and the Effects on Observations
- The foundations of observing dark energy dynamics with the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe
- The essence of quintessence and the cost of compression
- Present and future evidence for evolving dark energy
- The phenomenological approach to modeling the dark energy
- Constraints on the coupled quintessence from cosmic microwave background anisotropy and matter power spectrum
- Imprints of Dark Energy on Cosmic Structure Formation I) Realistic Quintessence Models and the Non-Linear Matter Power Spectrum
- Constraining gravity by the Large Scale Structure
- The Alcock-Paczynski test in redshifted twenty one centimeter maps
- Testable dark energy predictions from current data
- Simulations of Quintessential Cold Dark Matter: beyond the cosmological constant
- Probing dark energy models with extreme pairwise velocities of galaxy clusters from the DEUS-FUR simulations
- Can we ever distinguish between quintessence and a cosmological constant?
- Observational constraints on the dark energy density evolution
- The traces of anisotropic dark energy in light of Planck
- An indirect limit on the amplitude of primordial Gravitational Wave Background from CMB-Galaxy Cross Correlation
- Scaling Dark Energy
- Dynamical age of the universe as a constraint on the parametrization of dark energy equation of state
- Higher Dimensional Dark Energy Investigation with Variable and
- Effects on the two-point correlation function from the coupling of quintessence to dark matter
- Beyond Two Parameters: Revisiting Dark Energy with the Latest Cosmic Probes
- Beyond dark energy Fisher forecasts: how DESI will constrain LCDM and quintessence models
- Dark Energy in Chains