paper

Measuring age, metallicity and abundance ratios from absorption line indices

arXiv:astro-ph/0305247 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08123.x

Abstract

In this study we present detailed calculations of absorption line indices on the Lick System based on the stellar models by Salasnich et al. (2000) calculated with enhanced mix of alpha-elements. Using the so-called Response Functions (RFs) of Tripicco & Bell (1995, TB95), we calculate the indices for SSPs of different age, metallicity and enhancement. We made use of the triplet Hb, Mgb and <Fe>, and Minimum-Distance Method proposed by Trager et al. (2000, TFWG00) to estimate the age, metallicity and enhancement degree for the galaxies of the Gonzalez (1993) sample, and compare the results with those TFWG00 and Thomas et al (2003). Since very large differences are found, in particular as far as the age is concerned, we analyze in a great detail all possible sources of disagreement, going from the stellar models and SSPs to many technical details of the procedure to calculate the indices, and finally the pattern of chemical elements (especially when alpha-enhanced mixtures are adopted). The key issue of the analysis is that at given metallicity Z and enhancement factor, the specific abundance ratios [Xel/Fe] adopted for some elements (e.g. O, Mg, Ti, and likely others) dominate the scene because with the TB95 RFs they may strongly affect indices like Hb and the age in turn. Finally we have drawn some remarks on the interpretation of the distribution of early-type galaxies in popular two-indices planes, like Hb vs. [MgFe]. We argue that part of the scatter along the Hb axis observed in this plane could be attributed instead of the age, the current explanation, to a spread both in the degree of enhancement and some abundance ratios. The main conclusion of this study is that deriving ages, metallicities and degree of enhancement from line indices is a cumbersome affair whose results are still uncertain.

arXiv comment26 pages, 17 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS. This is a revised version of our previous submission to astro-ph/0305247

References in corpus (16)

Cited by in corpus (33)