Criticism of recent calculations of common envelope ejection
arXiv:astro-ph/0209141 · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06689.x
Abstract
We re-examine a recent claim by Han et al. (2002) that the ionization energy in the envelope has to be included in the ejection criterion of common envelopes. In particular, we argue that (1) they include a mass loss rate prior to the onset of the common envelope that is too low; (2) They do not include the energy radiated by the accreting white dwarf companion, as well as that emitted by the core of the giant star; and (3) As argued by one of us before, the opacity in the envelope is too low for the efficient usage of the ionization energy.
MNRAS, accepted; revised version of astro-ph/0209141
References in corpus (4)
Cited by in corpus (30)
- The Evolution of Compact Binary Star Systems
- Post-common-envelope binaries from SDSS. IX: Constraining the common-envelope efficiency
- A Circumbinary Disk in the Final Stages of Common Envelope and the Core-Degenerate Scenario for Type Ia Supernovae
- On the alpha formalism for the common envelope interaction
- The impact of companions on stellar evolution
- Hot subdwarfs from the ESO Supernova Ia Progenitor Survey - I. Atmospheric parameters and cool companions of sdB stars
- Accretion in common envelope evolution
- The Evolution of Compact Binary Star Systems
- A comprehensive population synthesis study of post-common envelope binaries
- Population synthesis for symbiotic stars with white dwarf accretors
- Efficient common-envelope ejection through dust-driven winds
- The limited role of recombination energy in common envelope removal
- Six detached white-dwarf close binaries
- Simulations of common envelope evolution in triple systems: Circumstellar case
- Monte Carlo simulations of post-common-envelope white dwarf + main sequence binaries: The effects of including recombination energy
- On the use of hydrogen recombination energy during common envelope events
- Common envelope evolution of eccentric binaries
- WD 1856 b: a close giant planet around a white dwarf that could have survived a common-envelope phase
- Post-common envelope binaries from SDSS - XVI. Long orbital period systems and the energy budget of CE evolution
- Energy transport by convection in the common envelope evolution
- Simulating a binary system that experiences the grazing envelope evolution
- Energizing the last phase of common envelope removal
- Evolutionary models of short-period soft X-ray transients: comparison with observations
- Formation of long-period post-common-envelope binaries I. No extra energy is needed to explain oxygen-neon white dwarfs paired with AFGK-type main-sequence stars
- Grazing envelope evolution toward Type IIb supernovae
- Formation of long-period post-common-envelope binaries II. Explaining the self-lensing binary KOI 3278
- The formation of the magnetic symbiotic star FN Sgr
- A survey for post common-envelope binary stars using GALEX and SDSS photometry
- Common envelope: the progress and the pitfalls
- Common envelope: progress and transients