Social Popularity of GitHub Projects: A Lifeline or a Liability?
arXiv:2607.00435 · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2026.113025
Abstract
Social coding platforms such as GitHub host millions of repositories, yet many suffer from high mortality rates. Despite this, several survival factors remain poorly understood. Human capital is widely recognized as essential. Social attention, while often assumed to be a lifeline, can become a liability. Structural features that improve onboarding, such as code readability and documentation, may also accelerate the cessation of active development when combined with massive visibility. To examine these dynamics, we analyzed more than 73,000 GitHub repositories using an Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) survival framework, which accounts for the time-varying nature of predictors. Our study identifies human capital as the most critical determinant of project survival. In contrast, excessive social attention emerges as a liability, and when coupled with accessibility features, it amplifies the risk of project inactivity. Importantly, when the number of contributors interacts with social popularity, the protective effect of labor becomes visible, highlighting the need for governance strategies that balance visibility with labor capacity to ensure the long-term resilience of open-source projects.
19 pages, 7 figures, 6 tables, 76 references
References in corpus (4)
- What's in a GitHub Star? Understanding Repository Starring Practices in a Social Coding Platform
- Will You Come Back to Contribute? Investigating the Inactivity of OSS Core Developers in GitHub
- Community Engagement and the Lifespan of Open-Source Software Projects
- The Death Spiral of Open Source Projects: A Post-Mortem Analysis of Pull Request Workflow Dynamics