AI of the People, by the People, for the People: A Social Choice Approach to Collective Control of Artificial Intelligence
arXiv:2605.16291 · doi:10.1145/3805689.3806808
Abstract
With the growing adoption of AI systems, reasoning about how society can exert control over AI becomes an increasingly urgent problem. Existing work on democratic control largely focuses on macro-level governance. In contrast, we propose a new approach grounded in social choice theory, which we term collective control of artificial intelligence. We argue that collective input can and should be incorporated at multiple points across the ML development pipeline, from data collection through objective design to alignment. We further demonstrate that social choice provides a well-suited modelling language for the treatment of collective input across all stages and that its axiomatic methodology yields principled criteria for evaluating various control mechanisms. Overall, our conceptual contribution provides a mathematically grounded framework to implement and analyse collective control of AI systems.
Accepted for publication in Proceedings of the 2026 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '26)
References in corpus (18)
- Learning under Concept Drift: A Review
- Practical and Ethical Challenges of Large Language Models in Education: A Systematic Scoping Review
- Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback
- Who Audits the Auditors? Recommendations from a field scan of the algorithmic auditing ecosystem
- The Effects of Data Quality on Machine Learning Performance on Tabular Data
- Multi-Winner Voting with Approval Preferences
- Collective Constitutional AI: Aligning a Language Model with Public Input
- Participation in the age of foundation models
- Beyond Preferences in AI Alignment
- Stakeholder Participation for Responsible AI Development: Disconnects Between Guidance and Current Practice
- Learning How to Vote with Principles: Axiomatic Insights Into the Collective Decisions of Neural Networks
- Decentralized Governance of Autonomous AI Agents
- Learning from Imperfect Annotations
- Estimating Deep Learning energy consumption based on model architecture and training environment
- Confident in the Crowd: Bayesian Inference to Improve Data Labelling in Crowdsourcing
- Subjective functions
- DeepVoting: Learning and Fine-Tuning Voting Rules with Canonical Embeddings
- A Theoretical Analysis of Soft-Label vs Hard-Label Training in Neural Networks