One's loss is (not) another's gain: Isotropic re-emission destabilizes mass transfer from radiative donor stars

Abstract

Non-conservative mass transfer plays a central role in close-binary evolution, yet its effects on mass-transfer stability are uncertain. One widely adopted prescription, isotropic re-emission, is often assumed to promote stability compared to conservative mass transfer. We investigate the impact of isotropic re-emission on the stability of mass transfer in binaries with radiative envelopes that undergo delayed dynamical instability (DDI). We assess whether simplified criteria used in binary population synthesis codes accurately capture stability boundaries under varying mass-transfer efficiencies. We perform detailed stellar evolution calculations for a set of representative binaries undergoing DDI. Varying the mass-transfer efficiency beta, we track the onset of instability and quantify the corresponding critical mass ratio. We compare our results with predictions from the commonly used zeta-method, which is based on mass-radius exponents. We find that a lower mass-transfer efficiency destabilizes mass transfer in DDI systems, whereas the zeta-method predicts that isotropic re-emission should stabilize it. The discrepancy arises because the zeta-method fails to capture the full evolution of the orbit and mass ratio during pre-instability mass transfer. In some cases, the critical mass ratio is underestimated by nearly a factor of two. Our findings show that isotropic re-emission can reduce, rather than enhance, DDI stability, underscoring the limitations of using fixed critical mass ratios and zeta-based criteria. This highlights the need for calibrated prescriptions that capture the time-dependent evolution of mass ratio and orbital separation, with direct implications for modelling X-ray binaries, symbiotic stars, and double white dwarfs, including their transient rates and delay-time distributions.

arXiv commentAccepted for publication in A&A Letters; 3 figures

References in corpus (17)

• Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA)
• Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Giant Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars
• Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Binaries, Pulsations, and Explosions
• Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Convective Boundaries, Element Diffusion, and Massive Star Explosions
• Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Pulsating Variable Stars, Rotation, Convective Boundaries, and Energy Conservation
• Comprehensive analytic formulae for stellar evolution as a function of mass and metallicity
• Common Envelope Evolution: Where we stand and how we can move forward
• The Origin of Subdwarf B Star (I): the Formation Channels
• Hot subluminous stars
• Supernova Type Ia progenitors from merging double white dwarfs: Using a new population synthesis model
• Theoretical uncertainties of the type Ia supernova rate
• Forming short-period Wolf-Rayet X-ray binaries and double black holes through stable mass transfer
• Formation of Low-Mass X-ray Binaries. I. Constraints on Hydrogen-Rich Donors at the Onset of the X-ray Phase
• Mass loss out of close binaries. II
• Coping with loss: Stability of mass transfer from post-main sequence donor stars
• Forming merging double compact objects with stable mass transfer
• Good things come to those who wait: Watching donor stars evolve towards a mass-transfer instability