From Toil to Thought: Designing for Strategic Exploration and Responsible AI in Systematic Literature Reviews
arXiv:2603.05514 · doi:10.1145/3742413.3789079
Abstract
Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) are fundamental to scientific progress, yet the process is hindered by a fragmented tool ecosystem that imposes a high cognitive load. This friction suppresses the iterative, exploratory nature of scholarly work. To investigate these challenges, we conducted an exploratory design study with 20 experienced researchers. This study identified key friction points: 1) the high cognitive load of managing iterative query refinement across multiple databases, 2) the overwhelming scale and pace of publication of modern literature, and 3) the tension between automation and scholarly agency. Informed by these findings, we developed ARC, a design probe that operationalizes solutions for multi-database integration, transparent iterative search, and verifiable AI-assisted screening. A comparative user study with 8 researchers suggests that an integrated environment facilitates a transition in scholarly work, moving researchers from managing administrative overhead to engaging in strategic exploration. By utilizing external representations to scaffold strategic exploration and transparent AI reasoning, our system supports verifiable judgment, aiming to augment expert contributions from initial creation through long-term maintenance of knowledge synthesis.
Accepted at IUI 26
References in corpus (12)
- Successful Combination of Database Search and Snowballing for Identification of Primary Studies in Systematic Literature Studies
- The Robots are Here: Navigating the Generative AI Revolution in Computing Education
- Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Large Language Models: The Role of Explanations, Sources, and Inconsistencies
- Threddy: An Interactive System for Personalized Thread-based Exploration and Organization of Scientific Literature
- Synergi: A Mixed-Initiative System for Scholarly Synthesis and Sensemaking
- CiteSee: Augmenting Citations in Scientific Papers with Persistent and Personalized Historical Context
- Relatedly: Scaffolding Literature Reviews with Existing Related Work Sections
- Scim: Intelligent Skimming Support for Scientific Papers
- Paperfetcher: A tool to automate handsearch for systematic reviews
- PaperWeaver: Enriching Topical Paper Alerts by Contextualizing Recommended Papers with User-collected Papers
- ComLittee: Literature Discovery with Personal Elected Author Committees
- ScholarMate: A Mixed-Initiative Tool for Qualitative Knowledge Work and Information Sensemaking