Auxiliary counterterms and their role in effective field theory

Abstract

Effective field theories include contact-range interactions (or counterterms) for two reasons: representing the unknown short-range physics in a model independent manner and ensuring the cutoff independence of observables. Both are intertwined: cutoff independence alone (modulo truncation errors) already generates counterterms encoding physical information not present in the known long-range physics. Yet, there is also residual cutoff dependence, which is smaller than the uncertainties that are achievable within the effective field theory description and thus can be safely neglected in most settings. If one insists on exact cutoff independence though, new counterterms will be required, but they encode no new physical information and are thus what one could call redundant, or auxiliary, counterterms. It happens that auxiliary counterterms are still useful for solving certain inconsistencies that appear during renormalization or for improving the convergence of the effective field theory expansion. Examples of these use cases are discussed, including the interpretation of the improved actions or the relation between perturbative and non-perturbative renormalization.

19 pages, corresponds with published version

References in corpus (13)

• Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces
• Local chiral effective field theory interactions and quantum Monte Carlo applications
• Power Counting of Contact-Range Currents in Effective Field Theory
• Renormalization Group Analysis of Boundary Conditions in Potential Scattering
• Comment on "How (not) to renormalize integral equations with singular potentials in effective field theory"
• Contact operators in renormalization of attractive singular potentials
• Perturbative Calculations of Deuteron Form Factors
• A further study on the renormalization group aspect of perturbative corrections
• Renormalization of proton-proton fusion in chiral effective field theory
• Perturbative renormalization of chiral nuclear forces at subleading order in 3S1-3D1 channel
• Regulator constraints for the perturbative renormalizability of attractive triplets
• Reexamining the perturbative renormalizability of the coupled triplets
• Feasibility of perturbative generation of bound-states from resonances or virtual states