CiteAudit: You Cited It, But Did You Read It? A Benchmark for Verifying Scientific References in the LLM Era
arXiv:2602.23452
Abstract
Scientific research relies on citation integrity, yet large language models (LLMs) have introduced a critical risk: fabricated references that appear plausible but correspond to no real publications. As manual verification becomes infeasible and existing automated tools remain fragile, we introduce CiteAudit, a comprehensive benchmark and detection framework for hallucinated citations. We design a multi-agent verification pipeline that decomposes citation checking into metadata extraction, memory lookup, web-based retrieval, and final judgment. To evaluate this, we construct a large-scale, human-validated dataset spanning diverse domains and hallucination types. Experiments demonstrate that our framework achieves superior verification performance over state-of-the-art LLMs and commercial baselines. Our work provides the necessary infrastructure to audit citations at scale and safeguard the trustworthiness of scholarly discourse. Code is available at https://github.com/shiiiikw/CiteAudit.
We have further refined the benchmark construction and reference verification pipeline to improve clarity and consistency. The revised version includes updated results and additional details to better align the evaluation with the intended setup. These changes provide a more precise presentation of the experimental findings, with conclusions and contributions remaining unchanged