From Joint to Single-System Psi-Onticity Without Preparation Independence
arXiv:2601.17662 · doi:10.1007/s10701-025-00910-w
Abstract
The Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph (PBR) theorem establishes -onticity for individual quantum systems, but its standard formulation relies on the Preparation Independence Postulate (PIP). This has led to a prevalent view that rejecting PIP leaves open the possibility of -epistemic models for individual systems. In this work, we show that this understanding is incomplete: once the PBR theorem establishes -onticity for composite systems prepared in product states, the -onticity of the individual subsystems follows directly from the tensor-product structure of quantum mechanics, without invoking PIP or any further auxiliary assumptions. This result removes a key auxiliary assumption from the PBR theorem, closes a persistent loophole for preserving -epistemic models, and strengthens the conceptual foundations of -ontology.
12 pages, no figures
References in corpus (7)
- On the reality of the quantum state
- Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
- Is the quantum state real? An extended review of -ontology theorems
- Distinct Quantum States Can Be Compatible with a Single State of Reality
- Implications of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph quantum no-go theorem
- Psi-Epistemic Theories: The Role of Symmetry
- No-go theorem for the composition of quantum systems