Lessons from pendulums: A design comparison of three lab activities
arXiv:2512.09781 · doi:10.1103/6g9j-s2cm
Abstract
We present three versions of a pendulum lab activity to explore how theoretical commitments, motivations, and aspirations reflect in curriculum design. In earlier work, Boudreaux & Elby (2020) discussed how different theoretical perspectives led them to different designs of tutorials. Here, we discuss our finding that even starting from the same theoretical perspective and having similar goals for students can lead to differences of design. We give three interacting reasons why our labs diverge: We have different expectations of students at our respective institutions; we have different ancillary goals; and we draw different implications from our shared theoretical commitments. Our account demonstrates the complexity of the relationship between theory, goals, and curriculum design. In this way, it adds to prior arguments for the importance of designers' articulating the reasoning for their choices as well as for the possible value of instructors' responsive adaptations to curricula.
References in corpus (15)
- Value added or misattributed? A multi-institution study on the educational benefit of labs for reinforcing physics content
- Open-ended versus guided laboratory activities: Impact on students' beliefs about experimental physics
- Quantitative comparisons to promote inquiry in the introductory physics lab
- Operationalizing the AAPT Learning Goals for the Lab
- Students' views about the nature of experimental physics
- Impact of a course transformation on students' reasoning about measurement uncertainty
- Not engaging with problems in the lab: Students' navigation of conflicting data and models
- Interactional processes for stabilizing conceptual coherences in physics
- Toolboxes and handing students a hammer: The effects of cueing and instruction on getting students to think critically
- Design, Analysis, Tools, and Apprenticeship (DATA) Lab
- Initial impacts of the transformation of a large introductory lab course focused on developing experimental skills and expert epistemology
- Instructing nontraditional physics labs: Toward responsiveness to student epistemic framing
- Student reasoning about measurement uncertainty in an introductory lab course
- Impact of an introductory lab on students' understanding of measurement uncertainty
- Surprise! Shifting students away from model-verifying frames in physics labs