The geography of novel and atypical research
arXiv:2510.20827 · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2025.105345
Abstract
The production of knowledge has become increasingly a global endeavor. Yet, location related factors, such as local working environment and national policy designs, may continue to affect what kind of science is being pursued. Here we examine the geography of the production of creative science by country, through the lens of novelty and atypicality proposed in Uzzi et al. (2013). We quantify a country's representativeness in novel and atypical science, finding persistent differences in propensity to generate creative works, even among developed countries that are large producers in science. We further cluster countries based on how their tendency to publish novel science changes over time, identifying one group of emerging countries. Our analyses point out the recent emergence of China not only as a large producer in science but also as a leader that disproportionately produces more novel and atypical research. Discipline specific analysis indicates that China's over-production of atypical science is limited to a few disciplines, especially its most prolific ones like materials science and chemistry.
arXiv commentAccepted at Research Policy; data and code at https://zenodo.org/records/15250119
References in corpus (9)
- The Building Blocks of Economic Complexity
- The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations
- International Research Collaboration: Novelty, Conventionality, and Atypicality in Knowledge Recombination
- The Scientific Competitiveness of Nations
- Interdisciplinarity: A Nobel Opportunity
- The latent structure of global scientific development
- Technological impact of biomedical research: the role of basicness and novelty
- The geography of references in elite articles: What countries contribute to the archives of knowledge
- Worldwide topology of the scientific subject profile: a macro approach on the country level