New inequality indicators for team ranking in multi-stage female professional cyclist races
arXiv:2508.20113 · doi:10.1177/17479541251365797
Abstract
Cycling competition is highly interesting since the team ranking is based on the best performance of some subset of team members. The paper develops new inequality indicators, a methodology to construct them, and numerical illustrations allowing to provide operative arguments in their favor. The numerical illustrations subsequently deal with hierarchical ranking indicators of (female) cyclist teams, competing in multi-stage races. For the illustration, the 2023 editions of the most famous long races for females are considered: 34th Giro d'Italia Donne, 2nd Tour de France Femmes, 9th Vuelta Femenina. Several classical ranking indicators are recalled and adapted to the study cases. The most usual indicator, , is based on the riders arriving time for the various stages, i.e., according to Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) standard rules. One also uses another indicator, , which requires that the riders finish the race, whence each stage, in order to define the race best team. Another contribution of the paper derives from specific developments of these indicators, thereby leading to new measures: the ''leadership gap" based on , and the ''competition temperature", based on entropy. It is argued that the numerical values point to differences in team strategy based on rider skill levels. The ranking of contributions to indicators allow to observe the "crucial core" made of the most competitive teams.
40 pages, 62 references, 8 tables, 7 figures; prepared for International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching
References in corpus (8)
- Quantifying incentive (in)compatibility: A case study from sports
- Ranking structures and Rank-Rank Correlations of Countries. The FIFA and UEFA cases
- Shannon Entropy and Herfindahl-Hirschman Index as Team's Performance and Competitive Balance Indicators in Cyclist Multi-Stage Races
- Hierarchy Selection: New team ranking indicators for cyclist multi-stage races
- A theory of best choice selection through objective arguments grounded in Linear Response Theory concepts
- Rank-size law, financial inequality indices and gain concentrations by cyclist teams. The case of a multiple stage bicycle race, like Tour de France
- Should one (be allowed to) replace the Cippolini's?
- Hint of a Universal Law for the Financial Gains of Competitive Sport Teams. The case of Tour de France cycle race