To CPL, or not to CPL? What we have not learned about the dark energy equation of state

Abstract

We show that using a Taylor expansion for the dark energy equation-of-state parameter and limiting it to the zeroth and first-order terms, i.e., the so-called Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parametrization in regimes where it has been shown to fail as a physics-based two-parameter model, instead of allowing for higher-order terms and then marginalizing over them, adds extra information not present in the data and leads to markedly different and potentially misleading conclusions. Fixing the higher-order terms to zero, one concludes that vacuum energy that is currently non-dynamical (e.g., the cosmological constant) is excluded at several $\sigma$ significance as the explanation of cosmic acceleration, even in Dark Energy Spectroscopic Survey (DESI) DR1 data. Meanwhile, instead marginalizing over the higher-order terms shows that we know neither the current dark energy equation of state nor its current rate of change well enough to make such a claim. The CPL parametrization also implies that dark energy exhibits phantom behavior at high redshifts, while we show that by allowing the higher-order terms---which is required in order to capture the behavior of the dark energy equation of state in regimes beyond the validity of the CPL parametrization---the evidence for this phantom-like dark energy significantly weakens. This is not an argument for the higher-order phenomenological parametrizations, but rather a caution regarding such parametrizations in general. This issue has become more prominent now with the recent release of high-quality Stage IV galaxy survey data. The results of analyses using simple parametrizations should be interpreted with great care.

arXiv comment7 pages, 2 figures, 1 table. Changes match published version

References in corpus (15)

• Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
• Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae
• Dynamics of dark energy
• Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe
• Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter
• Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology
• The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release
• Everything You Always Wanted To Know About The Cosmological Constant Problem (But Were Afraid To Ask)
• Comparison of the Legacy and Gold SnIa Dataset Constraints on Dark Energy Models
• Parameterization of Dark-Energy Properties: a Principal-Component Approach
• The Dynamics of Quintessence, The Quintessence of Dynamics
• Mechanisms for Primordial Black Hole Production in String Theory
• Marginal evidence for cosmic acceleration from Type Ia supernovae
• Cosmic distance inference from purely geometric BAO methods: Linear Point standard ruler and Correlation Function Model Fitting
• Cosmological forecasts for future galaxy surveys with the linear point standard ruler: Toward consistent BAO analyses far from a fiducial cosmology

Cited by in corpus (1)

• Thermodynamic reconstruction in observationally constrained dynamical dark energy models