On What Depends the Robustness of Multi-source Models to Missing Data in Earth Observation?

Abstract

In recent years, the development of robust multi-source models has emerged in the Earth Observation (EO) field. These are models that leverage data from diverse sources to improve predictive accuracy when there is missing data. Despite these advancements, the factors influencing the varying effectiveness of such models remain poorly understood. In this study, we evaluate the predictive performance of six state-of-the-art multi-source models in predicting scenarios where either a single data source is missing or only a single source is available. Our analysis reveals that the efficacy of these models is intricately tied to the nature of the task, the complementarity among data sources, and the model design. Surprisingly, we observe instances where the removal of certain data sources leads to improved predictive performance, challenging the assumption that incorporating all available data is always beneficial. These findings prompt critical reflections on model complexity and the necessity of all collected data sources, potentially shaping the way for more streamlined approaches in EO applications.

Accepted at IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2025

References in corpus (6)

• More Diverse Means Better: Multimodal Deep Learning Meets Remote Sensing Imagery Classification
• Understanding urban landuse from the above and ground perspectives: a deep learning, multimodal solution
• Urban Land Cover Classification with Missing Data Modalities Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
• Common Practices and Taxonomy in Deep Multi-view Fusion for Remote Sensing Applications
• Better, Not Just More: Data-Centric Machine Learning for Earth Observation
• Impact Assessment of Missing Data in Model Predictions for Earth Observation Applications