Enhancing Deliberativeness: Evaluating the Impact of Multimodal Reflection Nudges

Abstract

Nudging participants with text-based reflective nudges enhances deliberation quality on online deliberation platforms. The effectiveness of multimodal reflective nudges, however, remains largely unexplored. Given the multi-sensory nature of human perception, incorporating diverse modalities into self-reflection mechanisms has the potential to better support various reflective styles. This paper explores how presenting reflective nudges of different types (direct: persona and indirect: storytelling) in different modalities (text, image, video and audio) affects deliberation quality. We conducted two user studies with 20 and 200 participants respectively. The first study identifies the preferred modality for each type of reflective nudges, revealing that text is most preferred for persona and video is most preferred for storytelling. The second study assesses the impact of these modalities on deliberation quality. Our findings reveal distinct effects associated with each modality, providing valuable insights for developing more inclusive and effective online deliberation platforms.

CHI 2025

References in corpus (8)

• Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
• Information, Community, and Action: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media
• Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users' Views
• The anatomy of Reddit: An overview of academic research
• Beyond Text Generation: Supporting Writers with Continuous Automatic Text Summaries
• Nudge for Deliberativeness: How Interface Features Influence Online Discourse
• Help Me Reflect: Leveraging Self-Reflection Interface Nudges to Enhance Deliberativeness on Online Deliberation Platforms
• Design for Online Deliberative Processes and Technologies: Towards a Multidisciplinary Research Agenda